Viewing Single Post From: SUDS REPORT
Jul 11 2008, 01:32 PM
Considering he's a writer in the public eye, I can damn well critique his work. And I think it's lousy to reuse Passions spoilers rather than get something good.
- Steve Frame
- Jul 11 2008, 01:31 PM
- Jul 11 2008, 01:28 PM
- Steve Frame
- Jul 11 2008, 01:26 PM
- Jul 11 2008, 12:55 PM
- Jul 11 2008, 12:50 PM
- Jul 11 2008, 12:43 PM
Dude, I scooped you on the Passions spoilers yesterday.
Actually SOD's Insider E-Mail had those same exact spoilers word for word and you made no mention as to the source of the ones that you posted......
Neither did Nelson.
Nelson is in the biz just like Soap Opera Digest is. He does not have to provide a source.
He has inside sources just like Soap Opera Digest does - since if it is unknown to you - he works for TV Guide.
The catty sarcastic remarks are not welcome. so tone it down.
And that goes for anyone else who feels like they have to make a sarcastic or catty remark just for the sake of making one.
I'm not making any sarcastic remarks---I'm simply saying, rather than regurgitate the SOD spoilers, why doesn't Nelson provide us with some actual Passions scoop that didn't already appear somewhere else?
Nelson doesn't have to. This is his column. he reports what Passions gives him. If they don't give him anything else he can't report it.
It is ridiculous to think so.