Viewing Single Post From: SC interview
Aug 15 2008, 06:57 PM
- January 31, 2008
- Twitter ID
I guess the phrase "it's only a soap" works for certain characters. ;)
- Aug 15 2008, 06:47 PM
- Aug 15 2008, 06:12 PM
What about John? Wasn't that 2006 or it might have been 2005, I guess. She is always with one guy or another or after him. Roman before John, Victor before that and who was in between?. I mean, it never ends. I didn't say Daniel was blameless and if they decide to write this as a break up so be it, it's only a soap - but Kate the character has no reason in the world to say it isn't like her to sleep around. Turning one guy down doesn't erase the other 50 or so.
Kate slept with John once
in 2005, and they were engaged. What a SLUT!
Jesus, you claim she's with "one guy after another" (which she's not) because it never works out, I don't see how that makes Kate a "tramp". Oh, and in case you haven't noticed, people on soaps tend to be with one person after another, it's not that
crazy of a concept.
Honesly, I think your reasoning for Kate being such a dirty "whore" makes no sense. It makes about as much sense as Chan.
Do I need to start posting the few and far between dates that Kate has actually gotten laid? Or does proof not matter?
YES, it's only a soap, so then, Kate and Daniel shouldn't be too hard to swallow if others like them.
Poor Kate. I LOVE her!
I'm with you, fenderbabe.