|Viewing Single Post From: SC interview|
|CindyJean||Aug 15 2008, 07:18 PM|
Most of the dicussion was like a debate. NOt all of it was. I didn't think sarcasm over anothers opinion was a part of debate. For instance:|
Kate slept with John once in 2005, and they were engaged. What a SLUT! Jesus, you claim she's with "one guy after another" (which she's not) because it never works out, I don't see how that makes Kate a "tramp". Oh, and in case you haven't noticed, people on soaps tend to be with one person after another, it's not that crazy of a concept.
Honesly, I think your reasoning for Kate being such a dirty "whore" makes no sense. It makes about as much sense as Chan.
Do I need to start posting the few and far between dates that Kate has actually gotten laid? Or does proof not matter?
Edited by CindyJean, Aug 15 2008, 07:18 PM.
|SC interview · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion|