Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Enjoy forums? Start your own community for free.
Viewing Single Post From: SC interview
Member Avatar

Aug 15 2008, 07:18 PM
Most of the dicussion was like a debate. NOt all of it was. I didn't think sarcasm over anothers opinion was a part of debate. For instance:

Kate slept with John once in 2005, and they were engaged. What a SLUT! Jesus, you claim she's with "one guy after another" (which she's not) because it never works out, I don't see how that makes Kate a "tramp". Oh, and in case you haven't noticed, people on soaps tend to be with one person after another, it's not that crazy of a concept.

Honesly, I think your reasoning for Kate being such a dirty "whore" makes no sense. It makes about as much sense as Chan.

Do I need to start posting the few and far between dates that Kate has actually gotten laid? Or does proof not matter?
I'm looking over the post, I do not see where Fender "attacked" you, unless it's because she says your reasoning makes no sense. That is not attacking you, that's attacking the excuses you lined up for your accusation against Kate.

And I'm really not sure on why that one section is bolded since that certainly supports Fender's claim (and mine and Ladyofthelake) that Kate isn't a whore for having multiple partners over multiple years.
Offline Profile Quote Post
SC interview · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion