Viewing Single Post From: DAYS:Rachel Melvin blog 10/6
Oct 10 2008, 06:06 AM
- January 31, 2008
- Twitter ID
And, for many of us, again, it IS about the story. How they were pretty well thrown together, in many estimations. How Daniel seemed to work better with other characters to many of us. How Chelsea was almost in stalking mode at some points. How Daniel was put on this Ghandi pedastal. How Rachel just SEEMS too young, which she can't help. BUT, a slightly more mature looking actress could have carried this a little bit more realistically for us.
- Oct 10 2008, 03:30 AM
- Oct 10 2008, 03:06 AM
- Oct 10 2008, 03:04 AM
I can't understand why she would be want to be paired with an actor 20 years her senior! She's in her early 20's and he's in his 40's!!!
To be technical the actors are literally 20 years apart in age.
And what does that have to do with anything...I mean seriously. I don't understand why the age thing should even be a factor.
For Rachel this is about the story. What Daniel would mean for Chelsea....what he has meant. Daniel being the older guy brings a lot of things to the relationship that are new and exciting for Chelsea. Plus Daniel and Chelsea had a connection and they got really close. This storyline has the potential to be a great love story and that's all Rachel wanted....the chance for Chelsea to experience this love story...age has nothing to do with it for Rachel or Chelsea.....what is it with the age question? And just to throw this in there Shawn is hot and a lot of fun (from people that have met him) who wouldn't want to work with someone like that?
How Chelsea continues to run pouting to Nick when things don't go her way. Like I mentioned earlier, it ain't all about the age.