Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]



Viewing Single Post From: Storyline info from Sandra Robinson on BWR!
e83talus
Member Avatar


hops
Dec 21 2008, 01:30 PM
Kyrai
Dec 21 2008, 09:37 AM
For me, John and Marlena's struggle against Stefano has been more about family than either one of them just up against Stefano on their own. Without a stake, I'm not sure I can see years of story with either John or Marlena just going up against Stefano. It's about relationships and family to me. I do think this may be where Days has changed. It doesn't seem to be about relationships and family anymore (not just for J&M but for everyone), and if so, the show is just over for me.

I don't think that the way the writers have written John and Marlena poorly meaning no one can write them well. I can see so many ways this year could have gone. How different would this story have been if Stefano had planted 'anti-Marlena, anti-Brady' feelings in John? It was somewhat alluded to early in the story that Stefano altered John's ability to even feel. He programmed John to kill Colleen so it was definitely more than just memories involved. I wish we knew what Hogan had intended vs what played out. The story was wonderful in the beginning.

Everything on the show seems so geared to getting couples together asap versus taking time to set up and enjoy the story as it's playing out. I think if they just focused on stories and characters vs. a couple, it would be so much better for the show as a whole.
Totally agree with these thoughts.

And, I don't think John and Marlena / Stefano playing out their story this year is anymore repetitive then any of the triangle stories that are going on right now. I watched these same kind of triangles 20 years ago and they never end, they just bring in a new man or women for whoever and no one ever commits and it's why I've stopped watching most soaps. So to me, watching a couple overcome obstacles and still love each other and want to be with each other is a lot more interesting, because it's the exception not the rule. It's why I still care about John and Marlena and didn't stop watching, even when the writing sucked.
[So to me, watching a couple overcome obstacles and still love each other and want to be with each other is a lot more interesting, because it's the exception not the rule. It's why I still care about John and Marlena and didn't stop watching, even when the writing sucked./b]

ICAM with this statement. This is the main difference between old soap viewers and new soap viewers. New viewers tend to be fickle and less invested in families, traditions, and the long haul. Thats why we vet viewers hate the bed hopping going on while the newbies love the adventure and excitement of sleeping around just because.

It completely disgusts some people, me included, that Max has been given so few female options onscreen that he has to date his cousins. It is awful that Days got rid of the late 20-somethings (Belle, Shawn, Mimi, Chloe, so that Phillip has to go looking at the sorority crew for dates. Brady's have always been about family and it would stand to reason that Caroline would and should have a problem with her son, Max, dating her grandchildren, Stephanie and Chelsea.

I don't think old time fans of the show like us should be discounted but indeed Days has. Instead of having a combination of vets and younger s/l's that bring all demographics in they have decided to concentrate on the younger demo and completely disregard their vet viewers. I don't have a problem with newer viewers not "getting" the couples thing with Bope, Jarlena, and Payla. I am sure they don't understand why we don't like the partner swapping that has been going on over the last 6 months. Tha being said, Days execs have not been successful in writing for both those crowds which is a lack of creativity on their parts, not viewers. But let TPTB go on as they have been as older viewers tune out more and more.

Offline Profile Quote Post
Storyline info from Sandra Robinson on BWR! · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion