|Viewing Single Post From: These 'Days,' Daniel's in danger & denial|
|fenderbabe||Jan 2 2009, 08:40 PM|
Okay, so NOW does anyone want to try and tell me it's the writers honest to God intention to write Daniel/Chloe as nothing but pure animal lust and that they're not trying to be another meaningless-but-totally-not-meaningless-because-they-care-about-each-other pairing?|
I can't find that barfing smiley, so just pretend that it's here.
|These 'Days,' Daniel's in danger & denial · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion|