|Viewing Single Post From: DAYS:Spoilers for wk of February 23rd|
|ges||Feb 20 2009, 11:26 AM|
The writers have really screwed up on this one. It makes no sense no matter how you look at it. What they need to do is own up to the fact that the" Sammi is afraid of Stephano and abandoned her baby to the care of nuns with occasional visits," is moronic a story that made no sense from the beginning. Why not something plausible like E.J. had broken up with her and declared his intention to spend his life with Nicole and she was too upset, jealous, embarrassed, whatever to have his baby. She did not want him to be with her out of pity. Any number of reasons why women hide the paternity of the father would do. Anything but this which is an insult to the intelligence of anybody that watches the show. I actually long for the days of Stan. Sammi responds well to blackmail. Shoulda blackmailed her into keeping the baby a secret. But to say the baby is dead? That is as bad as Nicole not telling E.J. that their baby is dead.
This is getting past drama and into sicko territory.
|DAYS:Spoilers for wk of February 23rd · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion|