Viewing Single Post From: DAYS:Spoilers for week of March 16th
Mar 8 2009, 08:28 AM
- Elite Member
- July 27, 2008
well as a fan of sami who has committed some of the worst crimes in daytime history, i figured you could see the point that just because someone does bad things doesn't mean they deserve to lose everything. no other villain has, so why should nicole be the first?
- Mar 8 2009, 12:21 AM
- Mar 7 2009, 08:39 PM
- Mar 7 2009, 02:38 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
geez louise, let's not begrudge nicole of any possible happiness. we've had plenty of moments with nicole in the past week where she has said she feels guilty for leaving grace behind, so she clearly feels bad about it and it's not all about figuring ou what sami is up to. anyway, i think her losing sydney and ej is enough. after all, sami would rather leave her kid in an orphange rather than come up with a lie to explain her presence, but that doesn't mean i don't think she deserves her own baby at the end of the day. we all like to see the villainess crash and burn, but usually they have something to keep them going after their schemes are revealed. in this case, i hope nicole gets to keep grace.
Begrudge the woman who coerced a young pregnant teen in to giving her baby to her to raise, with the promise that she would love and cherish it - only to have her turn around within the hour and trade up to a different baby that better suits her scheme? Sorry. What was I thinking. ^o)
I don't think Nicole will wind up with nothing. I suspect she'll wind up with Brady mopping up her mess as best he can behind her. But under NO circumstance should she wind up with anyone else's baby. The very idea is horrific. :shame:
i also wouldn't say she coerced mia. its not like she found some happy pregnant woman who was ready to give birth and raise her child and then talked her into giving it up. mia always wanted to give the baby up for adoption.