|Viewing Single Post From: B&B: March Discussion|
|bellcurve||Mar 14 2009, 02:59 PM|
I know this is very nitpicky, but I hate these little "hot dog" banters between Lt. Baker and Charlie.|
Do the writers at B&B assume these references and little chats make the characters more real? Nothing could be further from the truth.
I can handle pistachios and puzzles from Nick and Katie because they are at least involved in story. We got to know Nick and Katie as people through their banter and they talked about something while they were putting the puzzles together and eating the pistachios.
If Brad doesn't plan on using Lt. and Charlie Baker in stories, why bother with these stupid little moments? And even if they insisted on these little chats between father and son, can they talk about something else other than hot dogs? I mean, if I wanted conversations about Hot Dogs, I'd run out to a Weinerschitzel. Zzzzzzzzzzzz.
|B&B: March Discussion · Y&R & B&B: News, Spoilers & Discussion|