Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

Viewing Single Post From: DAYS:Spoilers for wk of June 8th

Jun 8 2009, 01:27 PM
LOL, it's me being quoted.

But just to clarify, here's what I meant. I said that I thought that for the first time in a long time, Days is taking a risk with a storyline (just like I'm risking posting my "thoughts" here LOL! What is life without a risk, eh?). Killing off Grace isn't the risk, but it's the personalities involved and the "crimes" that they've committed that is the risky part. Not one of the major players in this story is innocent or pure in his/her actions. How do you root for baby thievery? How to do root for another man to step in an adopt another man's child? How do you root for a woman allowing a man to grieve a child that wasn't his or not allowing him to grieve a child that was lost? How do you root for a woman allowing another man to take a father's place and then not telling the man until after the fact that his child has died? It's hard for me to root for anyone -- and that's precisely why I'm starting to like this story. It's not an easy road for the show to take. One of my complaints about the show over the years is that they always take the easy road out, the path of least resistance. And it made it so incredibly tedious for me to watch because I knew, based on the fact that Days wouldn't do anything to rock the boat, that ultimately I'd be disappointed by the lack of drama. But this, I'm shocked. I really am and I looking forward to seeing how this is handled.

In any case, EJ, surprisingly, is the lone character who didn't play a part in the deception, although his actions in his own life, becoming Stefano obedient son, did help things along. But I was thinking about: Nicole, Sami, Rafe -- every single one of them has done wrong. Sami's motives may have been pure at first, but once she crossed the line into allowing another man to adopt EJ's baby and then not telling EJ until after his baby was gone that she was his -- I can't justify it even though Sami is a favorite character of mine. Nicole, she may have been motivated by her love for EJ at first, but now she sits in a church crying, begging to be punished but not willing to tell the truth for fear of losing everything. But still, they are playing the sympathy heavily with Nicole, in that she suffering a lot of guilt. That's OK, BTW, that's her character. Rafe to a much lesser extent because he basically was stealing another man's child, forging documents to get custody of Grace and Sami basically smiling about without any thought of possible consequences because she'll now have her dream life with her dream man. EJ, if he hadn't chosen to live a gangster life, Sami probably wouldn't have kept Grace's paternity a secret from him.

The punishment part. I don't think a character deserves punishment. What I was saying is that out of all of the characters, Sami's is the sole character that can take the hit of telling the truth. In the SOD interview, Ali Sweeney did mention that Sami wants to be punished and she knows that by telling the truth, EJ will indeed punish her. The question for me is why does she do this? I'm still not clear on that. In any case, the audience is used to Sami getting caught. Regardless of her intent, because of Grace's death she has decided to face up to the consequences. I have a suspicion that Ali won't play it for sympathy. I think Sami probably will be harsh when she blurts out the whole truth to EJ. I could be wrong about that though since they are being extra tight lipped with this spoiler. Sami is about to take it on the chin and the process may not come out smelling like a rose. What I was saying is that Nicole's character couldn't survive that kind of scene or writing. That's not saying the Ari wouldn't act it to the hilt, but as a character, Nicole's has to have a sympathetic edge or else she'd be toast because she doesn't not have the history of Sami. We expect Sami to get caught, to say awful things, to hurt people, especially those that she loves. But she manages to survive as a character.

Hopefully that makes sense and doesn't offend. And sorry for the long post.
I think you post has some very good points. In my post I am not rooting for Sami. I am just disagreeing that she should be punsihed for doing what she think is best for her child based on the experience of what she has had to live through with the first child with this man.

She was not trying to be cruel to Grace but protect her. So whilst not hiding her paternity from the biological father would have been the right thing to do. Sami didn't hide Grace's paternity to punish EJ [he was never to find out] or be evil to Grace. Sami meant well but did the wrong thing to achieve it.

What Nicole did was not right either, but worse. She knew that Sami was coming back for her baby because she overheard the conversation at the clinic between Sami and Sis Theresa. If Sami had planned to leave Syndey at the clinic for strangers to come and adopt I would be rooting for Nicole because I would say Sami didn't want the baby anyway so Nicole might as well bring her to EJ to raise. Nicole stole Sami's baby to palm her off as her own, so she wouldn't have to risk EJ calling off the wedding when he found out their baby died. She wants EJs money and the Dimera luxury and Sami would sacrifice it all for a quite and safe exsitence with her kids. Two completely different motivations - but none of the actions are right not Sami's and not Nicole's. Should Nicole be punished? I think she should give Sydney back to Sami which is going to be punishment enough. She loves that baby and 'is' her mother now, she was grieving at the time and a bit crazy when she took her, she should be let off the hook too. Now EJ has no such excuse for the hit on Philip, the beating of Brady and kidnap of Stephanie not even in the same ball park as Sami and Nicole's 'crimes'. JMO
Offline Profile Quote Post
DAYS:Spoilers for wk of June 8th · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion