|Viewing Single Post From: New Ed Scott Interview!|
|PhoenixRising05||Jun 24 2009, 11:19 PM|
I can see why one would suggest that but there was just too much said at the time to suggest it didn't happen. Those who did report it have a good track record and I know over at SON when the story was posted one of the people that runs that board (his name is Toups) made a post about not wanting to get involved in the story. He has inside sources and is always getting info, which he doesn't post much of. He merely said it was about to get ugly and that he was staying away from the story. That says it all IMO. Many sites picked up the story and ran with it too.
Plus, Corday could never fire Ed Scott if it weren't true. Sony forced Ed on him and would never let Corday get rid of him without reason. Ed provided a reason.
We have the same evidence that Higley scabbed that we have that Ed did what he did. Everyone knows she did it and I think it's fair to assume he did. Otherwise, why is he gone? It would've never happened otherwise. WGA never seems to followup on much of their investigation so them not coming out with anything on Ed, Higley, or anyone involved does not mean it didn't happen. It just means they didn't have enough to justify disciplinary action.
|New Ed Scott Interview! · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion|