|Viewing Single Post From: New Ed Scott Interview!|
|esp13||Jun 25 2009, 09:03 AM|
Fair enough. I understand why you choose to believe that it is absolutely true. For me, there isn't enough to convict him. It's entirely possible, maybe even probable, that the allegations are true. But, unproven allegations aren't sufficient to me. If the WGA didn't have enough proof to go through a formal process, that speaks volumes to me.|
As for why Kenny fired him if Ed didn't do anything wrong, maybe it was because he just decided to side with Dena in the power struggle. Or maybe Dena's accusations just stirred up enough trouble, even if they weren't entirely accurate, that it was easier to get rid of Ed Scott. I don't know. But, neither does anyone else, not for sure anyway. At least not anyone willing to name actual names or anything.
In any case, I'm not saying Ed didn't do anything wrong, I'm just saying that nobody has proven that he did, nor has anybody provided anykind of evidence that would allow us to judge for ourselves. So, for me, his guilt is far from established.
|New Ed Scott Interview! · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion|