Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

Viewing Single Post From: Spoilers for wk of June 7th

Jun 11 2010, 03:50 PM
Jun 10 2010, 08:42 PM
Jun 10 2010, 07:31 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
And EJ still has no plans to tell Sami the truth. He is content to let her live in the mansion under false pretenses of his father dying, while plotting to keep Anna quiet or dead and letting daddy take care of Rafe so he can never tell Sami the truth.
If EJ totally loved Sami like we are supposed to believe, then he would have taken his chances, told her what he did, why, and that he loves her instead of continuing to lie and manipulate. Now, he is going to make a pact with Nicole of all people-- the woman who never told him she lost their baby and faked a pregnancy, and switched babies, not to mention kidnapped Sydney to begin with--- to protect his lies even more. And all the while, he is making Sami believe that he is just a stand up guy who is concerned about her and only wants her to be happy. Yeah, well, if he really had wanted that with Sami, he wouldnt have put her through all this in the first place. The only way EJ can get Sami is through lies and manipulations. Always has been that way. He doesn't know any different.

Although what Sami did may not have been morally right, it wasn't a crime. What EJ did was--- several crimes, in fact. I don't see how the two compare, especially since he was willing to take both Sydney and Johnny away for good and never let Sami see them again or them see their mother. That makes whatever Sami did not look as bad.
I believe it is a crime to keep a child away from it's parent. A father has rights. It is certainly illegal to create fake birth documents.
I will look it up.
Fake birth documents, yes. But you're not required to name the father on the birth certificate. A father can only have rights if he knows he's a father.
Offline Profile Quote Post
Spoilers for wk of June 7th · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion