Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]



Viewing Single Post From: September 10-14 2012 Ratings
Cerulean
Member Avatar


Partnersincrime
Sep 23 2012, 09:56 AM
Cerulean
Sep 23 2012, 09:51 AM
Liz<3Days
Sep 23 2012, 09:39 AM
Cerulean
Sep 23 2012, 09:13 AM
Can someone explain to me how flipping the calendar back to Safe is going to help Days earn a renewal, because when I looked up the numbers I became even further confused? :drunk:

Thanksgiving week 2010 (Safe's wedding, interrupted by EJole taking custody of Johnny & Sidney) - HHs: 1.8 - 18-49: 0.9 - 18-34: 0.7

Thanksgiving week 2011 (EJami grief sex) - HHs: 1.9; 18-49: 1.1; 18-34: 0.8

A month later, during the week after Christmas (which is traditionally highest rated of year and included Safe renewing their wedding vows at HTS), 18-49 had fallen 0.2 to 0.9, and 18-34 had plunged 0.3 to a dismal 0.5.

If TomSell are dead set against EJami, that's one thing, but this unbending determination to play it Safe is another. Where are Sony and NBC in all of this? They cannot be pleased with how quickly the new/old team squandered all the momentum gained by the Olympic cliffhanger. :badmood:
Why didnt you go back another year to 09? Safe was on back then too?

I found it:

NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEK OF NOVEMBER 23-NOVEMBER 27, 2009
3. Days of Our Lives NBC 2.2/07


DAYS has been getting 1.7s- 1.9 all last year. Beastsex wasnt a watershed event. DAYS did get 1.9 before it happen:

NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 26-SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
3. Days of Our Lives NBC 1.9/06


I dont care for SAFE and at this point I barely care for DAYS, but if you're going to say that EJ and Sami being together was some kind of ratings juggernaut, then the proof is not there. How about this past Spring and Summer? They were heavily featured, was it all 1.9s then?

(I checked that too...1.7s-1.9s...and a 1.6)

http://www.jason47.com/days/ratings2012.html

The ratings will fluctuate between those numbers because at this point, I dont think no one couple, event, return, is going to have a sustaining ratings impact. In fact the only year consistently at 2.0s was 2009 (and it wasnt a EJ and Sami year.) ;)

Because EJ and Sami were in play too, along with Safe and EJole. EJ wasn't shown to be the Sydnapper until January 2010. Until then, anyone with any familiarity with soaps would assume that the parents would be reunited when their child was found. :shrug:
and anyone with any familiarity with soaps would assume that ej will pay of bad stuff he done instead reward for it
just saying
Sami matches EJ tit for tat, so why are EJ and Nicole continually punished for their misdeeds, while Sami's are glossed over? :hmmph: I say this as viewer who likes all three. They're the reason I watch, or at least why I did watch.
Offline Profile Quote Post
September 10-14 2012 Ratings · General Daytime News