|Viewing Single Post From: Real Housewives of... Discussion|
|px780||Dec 11 2012, 05:41 PM|
Lol- so true. Not good planning to ditch a new HW three episodes into the season before she's caught on.
And the Sur scene- that waitress was frickin' gorgeous! I know it's Hollywood and whatnot, but damn!
I think that it'd be different if it were just her kids off-camera. But Adrienne- whose wealth never seemed as glamorous and aspirational as Lisa's, imho- also seems to have downplayed her marital problems, her business ventures (since the whole shoe thing), and her anti-Lisa campaign was conducted in the shadows somewhere far off-camera.
Point is, if Bravo was OK with cutting some of her life out while paying her to live on camera, I can totally understand why they'd change their minds. In a way it reminds me of Teresa. It's just being a bad employee.
The other thing is...I get really bugged by the idea that Adrienne is somehow entitled to control her image on the show. She made a deal with the devil for exposure, secrets getting brought to light is a natural, foreseeable consequence. Brandi's an ass for bringing it up (maybe, who knows what "it" really is), but Adrienne totally put her family in this position, imho. I can't feel sorry for her or give her a pass. Or say that Brandi shouldn't have said anything.
I mean, if we give Kim a pass for public disclosure to Paul/Adrienne because that's how reality tv works, shouldn't Brandi get a pass for talking about real life in front of the cameras? Maybe Brandi just doesn't like being complicit in Adrienne's lie. I'm not sure that's a negative character trait.
JMHO of course. I'm actually kind of glad for this distraction today. So much easier to rant about tv shows than work.
|Real Housewives of... Discussion · Primetime Discussion|