Follow @DaytimeRoyalty
| Viewing Single Post From: Monday, December 17th Daily Discussion | |
|---|---|
| jb1183 | Dec 17 2012, 05:15 PM |
![]()
|
Perfectly stated. It wasn't about "owing" Jack anything. It was about decency. Once Daniel knew the full story of what happened to Jack and that he didn't actually abandon Jennifer, he should have immediately stepped aside and encouraged Jennifer and Abigail to think more rationally about the situation. Instead he fed their misplaced anger at Jack and refused to back down from pursuing Jen. It doesn't matter that Jack and Jen were already divorced-Jen divorced him based on what was ultimately false information. Once the full story was known, Daniel should have encouraged a reconciliation-instead he put a man who had just been tortured for a year in the position of having to "compete" for his own wife. Jen, Abigail, and Daniel all share responsibility for their shocking lack of empathy toward Jack and the horrible situation he endured. |
![]() |
|
| Monday, December 17th Daily Discussion · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion | |





8:25 AM May 20