|
Viewing Single Post From: Thursday, January 10th Daily Discussion
|
|
elci525
|
Jan 10 2013, 03:17 PM
|
- Posts:
- 979
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #11,934
- Joined:
- May 15, 2012
- Favorite Current Daytime Soap Opera
- Days of Our Lives
- Favorite Soap Opera of All Time
- Days of Our Lives
- Favorite Current Primetime Soap Opera
- Revenge
- Favorite Primetime Soap Opera of All Time
- Beverly Hills 90210
- Twitter ID
- @lorencapps
- YouTube ID
- elci525
|
- concerned
- Jan 10 2013, 03:11 PM
- elci525
- Jan 10 2013, 02:22 PM
- SocRMum1
- Jan 10 2013, 02:11 PM
- JessicaLeigh
- Jan 10 2013, 01:47 PM
E.J. in the present incarnation is a better Hugh Grant than Hugh Grant.
I haven't seen today's show yet...but this doesn't sound like a bad thing to me. :wub:
Well I don't know about being a better Hugh Grant than Hugh Grant (I ADORE Hugh Grant), but as charming and handsome and erudite as Hugh Grant's characters are, in no way should EJ be acting like a bloke out of Notting Hill or Four Weddings. So I found it a little disturbing today, to be totally honest. Because if I am going to like EJ, I am going to like him as a sexy villain. Not as someone dithering and sheepish. JS is handsome and undeniably charming, so it's not the most offensive thing on the planet. But it's not the look I want for EJ.
He could do Hugh Grant from Bridget Jones Diary - Daniel Cleaver. That was sexy villain. (and crappy fighter)
That would be more acceptable, as Daniel Cleaver was an ass and a cad but a charmer from the gate. Who turned out to be a total sleaze and lost the girl =)
But I cited Notting Hill and Four Weddings for a reason...that was just disappointing to see EJ like that, and I don't even care all that much for the character.
On another note, I rather loved Chloe just closing the door on Kate during one of Kate's rants. Awesome.
Edited by elci525, Jan 10 2013, 03:17 PM. |
|
|
1:50 PM May 24