Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]



Viewing Single Post From: Spoilers for the week of January 21st
six
Member Avatar


elci525
Jan 16 2013, 11:17 AM
six
Jan 16 2013, 11:06 AM
elci525
Jan 16 2013, 10:55 AM
SoapGal1
Jan 16 2013, 09:42 AM
I no more expect the TV shows I watch to give me my moral compass than I believe the Real World on MtV is in fact, the real world.

Movies or television or neither good ways to learn about life or good examples about how situation should be handled.

I just don't think that is a fair analogy. You may be using that example of MTV's Real World as not being a slice of the real world in a hyperbolic fashion. And, for the record, there was a time when I think the Real World did shine an interesting reflective light on what it meant to be a young adult - this is why I love the early 90s so much - but that is a separate point. I won't watch that show now and think, how dare they?!?!? This is in NO way how anyone in the real world acts, because, duhhhh. And for the most part I say that about this soap opera too. But any fiction can appeal to people both as entertainment in some ways, in some story-lines, and touch a more personal, resonant chord in other ways, and that is most fair. This can happen because we come to love particular characters or particular relationships and want the best for those stories, or because a storyline connects in a way another doesn't, or because, if the writing and acting is good, we see something of ourselves in a character's struggles, choices or behaviors. And I think that is fine, and it is not foolish. Does it set a viewer up for disappointment? Sure, but that just means someone somewhere cares, and that is a nice feeling too.

Give me Kate and Sami fighting or odd possession storylines or alien brothers and sisters or affairs and paternity secrets any day. All good, all delicious, all things I love that if I saw happen in the real world, I might give up on the human race. But show me other characters, storylines, handling of issues, etc. and I may have a bigger problem and care that these storylines are treated superficially, etc. And I might question how responsible or irresponsible a portrayal is. A soap opera does not have an obligation to be a pillar of anything except exciting or provocative entertainment, I guess. But if I decided that in some cases I would have wanted better or different for my characters and I leave disappointed, that's reasonable.
Is it really reasonable to expect to get something you know you aren't going to get, though? I guess it might be understandable, but if you've cheerfully enjoyed a show that lacks a moral center for years, it strikes me as unreasonable to start complaining when the show delivers the same questionable content it has for decades.
Hmmm. Well, I am not sure you are addressing me directly, but since I can only answer for myself I will. Who has been cheerfully enjoying this show for years and is all of a sudden calling foul?? ME?? Because I have not. I have been vastly entertained and excited by this show, and likewise hurt, upset, disappointed, angry, etc. since the beginning of my viewing. And no, I don't think, oh, well this show clearly lacks any moral center, so I won't bother having a feeling, reaction, response that is anything but, "meh, it's just a soap opera". And that I have no reason or grounds to complain. No, I adamantly disagree. Having that mix of emotions is, I think, yes, most reasonable - as it reflects enjoying some storylines for what they are, being generally flippant or indifferent about others, and caring about a select few for my personal reasons. IMO that is what it is to be an active participant in this show, not just a passive consumer. Or that is how I actively participate, anyway. I react, I have feelings, I want differently, I want better, I want more, etc. Why am I expecting something that I know I am not going to get? Because I should have no expectations of this show? Ok, I don't agree, and that is not how I watch or enjoy this show. Do I care too much? Am I setting myself up for a fall? Maybe. I am like this with many narratives - textual, filmic, etc. - and I am often left sad. But I am also elevated to very nice, high levels of glee, and I will take that mixed bag. It's not that I am necessarily surprised the soap opera chooses to take a cavalier attitude towards a storyline; it's just that I am disappointed. I don't complain about everything, just those s/lines or characters or choices that for my valid reasons matter to me. It is both understandable and reasonable, while also maybe slightly unhealthy? LOL, that I could cop to.
No, I'm not addressing you personally. :) I think all of us have a personal connection to the show and its characters; otherwise we wouldn't be here on DR. What I don't think makes sense though is suddenly expecting Days to suddenly deliver something that it hasn't delivered in so long if ever. I just don't see how anyone who is outraged about the current show and concerned about the impact it is going to have on society didn't run screaming from the show after watching their first week's worth of episodes.
Edited by six, Jan 16 2013, 01:16 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post
Spoilers for the week of January 21st · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion