Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
Viewing Single Post From: Friday, March 29th Daily Discussion

Mar 30 2013, 07:03 AM
If Nick was raped in prison and that's why he's doing what he's doing, it's still morally objectionable, because the show is sending a message the homophobia is "understandable" and people have good reasons for it. This week a prominent physician, professor and potential presidential candidate compared being gay to pedophilia and bestiality. I'm going out on a limb and say he doesn't think that because he was raped by a man. He thinks it because he's a bigot.

Show me a plotline where a female rape victim starts objecting to heterosexuality, and I'll start discussing whether this makes sense. Instead, female rape victims are usually blamed because they "didn't act like ladies" or drank or wore short skirt, and therefor were asking for it. That is equally bullshit, but I've never seen a soap do a plotline about it because that would be socially irresponsible.
I think some people are reading too much into this, and a correction: Ben Anderson did not compare gay marriage to bestiality. That was the spin though. He simply made a slipper slope argument about redefining marriage. See this article: http://www.mediaite.com/online/why-dr-ben-carson-shouldn%E2%80%99t-have-to-apologize-for-his-%E2%80%98bestiality%E2%80%99-remark/

But back on topic: What people sometimes forget is that this is Nick's story, just like Gabi's is Gabi's story. IF Nick became homophobic because of his time in prison, that's okay. It shouldn't suggest it's sending a message that's right or wrong. It's just Nick's story. It's what legitimately happened to him. Because in real life, people respond to things differently from others. And it's not always PC.
Edited by nightfan, Mar 30 2013, 02:45 PM.
Offline Profile
Friday, March 29th Daily Discussion · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion