Viewing Single Post From: Tuesday, April 2nd Daily Discussion
Apr 2 2013, 07:18 PM
- May 20, 2009
No, but it was intended to call someone out on hypocrisy and didn't go so well for you. Please stop trying to call out everyone else and just discuss. You can "check" on these things in a more respectful way that's a little more conducive to discussion.
- Apr 2 2013, 07:14 PM
- Apr 2 2013, 06:58 PM
- The Room Stops
- Apr 2 2013, 06:51 PM
- Apr 2 2013, 06:16 PM
Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
Crime, rapes being mentioned, I'm guessing. Kristen raped John, did awful things to him and to Marlena, almost killed their daughter - now she's going to destroy their son to destroy them... it was a response to the "I don't care if it happened long ago".
Since when did Kristen rape John? I missed that episode. Anyway, I know about the rest of the things Kristen did. It still seemed like an odd question though, because I got the impression that concerned was expecting me to have an issue with jisten for some deeper reason besides "most people do," which I'm not even sure is true. There's more than one fan supported pairing out there where the characters have a history of hurting each other.
I just wanted to check if the "we should let past fictional crimes rest in peace and not impact on our current interpretation of the storylines" approach continued across the board.
Kristen and John just happened to be the first example that came to mind of a possible couple who had done things to each other that may prohibit them ( in some peoples minds) happily getting together. It wasn't a couple specific thing.