Viewing Single Post From: Y&R: April Discussion
Apr 11 2013, 11:27 PM
- Elite Member
- May 18, 2009
- Favorite Current Daytime Soap Opera
- Favorite Soap Opera of All Time
- Favorite Current Primetime Soap Opera
- CASTLE, Hawaii 5-0
nick has more right to question sharon than the other way around, nick didn't marry the person who stole faith, etc etc, nick is not in need of a psychiatrist, nick is not unbalanced enough to set his dad's house on fire, etc, etc.
- Panda Panda
- Apr 11 2013, 04:04 PM
- Queen B
- Apr 11 2013, 03:49 PM
- Sammie Jo
- Apr 11 2013, 01:18 PM
- Apr 11 2013, 12:36 PM
Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
yeah I heard that! LOL
Actually Sharon had every right to question Nick, he is constantly trying to dictate Sharon's life choices so what's so wrong about Sharon wanting to be involved on Nick's decisions as well? Especially when it effects Faith? Again with the double standards!
I agree with you that Sharon has a right to question Nick about any big relationship decisions that will affect Faith, as does Nick with Sharon.
I just thought it was weird that they're trying make Sharon against the marriage. She LIKES Avery and they're "kinda-friends" Sharon knows that Avery would be a good influence on Faith, so I just don't get why the writers decided to make Sharon opposed to the possible union. :shrug:
Sharon had no right to snoop in nick's house, and then go running to dylan with the news.
Avery is a competant atty, with no mental issues so far, sharon isn't fit to babysit a kitten, she's no more concerned about Faith's welfare than the man in the moon, if she was she wouldn't be sniffing around adam every chance she gets.. She's just nosy and jealous.
If nick tossed her down on the couch, she'd be out of her clothes before you could sneeze.