Viewing Single Post From: Spoilers for the week of April 29th
Apr 22 2013, 12:13 PM
- May 6, 2010
I get what you're saying about EJ's own actions being to blame for him getting shot, but there are waaaaay too many steps in between to say it's EJ's fault for Will losing his kid. What about all the decisions/mistakes that Will, Nick and others have made in between EJ's nefarious deeds and Will losing his kid? Do they not own their decisions/actions? If we're going to blame it all on EJ, we might as well say it's all Santo and Colleen's fault that Will lost his child because they started the Brady-DiMera feud in the first place.
- Apr 22 2013, 10:25 AM
- Apr 22 2013, 08:29 AM
- Apr 22 2013, 08:15 AM
- Apr 22 2013, 08:09 AM
Quoting limited to 4 levels deep[even she not ask anyone from her family]to help from to steal from police evidence room
it seem more stupid now
It is stupid....frankly she could have asked Hope or ROman to get the evidence...heck if she would have told Rafe the truth about Nick and what he'd done, maybe he would have helped...it's not like if Rafe hadn't covered up for her own shooting of Ej, or even was willing to cover up when he thought Will did it....it's just stupid.....there is no reason why Ej is in this but you know...God forbid Ej freaking Dimera isn't in this story...somehow....someway
And why wouldn't EJ be involved? I mean being Sami's fiance, Will's friend and confident alone gives him a right.
As for the brilliance of the scheme, I think it was more about them dragging the sl until May Sweeps, set up the Stefano vs EJAMI drama and Sami and her OTT antics :lol:
The sl would have been over the first week if they went with the obvious solutions.
It's all EJ's fault that Will is losing his daughter, so it makes no sense for Will to be a confident and friend to EJ, he should be pissed at him. He's being forced into that role to force Lucas out.
This isn't supposed to be ejami drama featuring EJ and Sami's tantrums, it's supposed to be a Wilson and Nabi story, that's the problem people are having.