Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]



Viewing Single Post From: Friday, May 24th Daily Discussion
nickyj12345
Member Avatar


angie37
May 27 2013, 10:22 PM
annie21
May 27 2013, 09:41 PM
angie37
May 27 2013, 09:38 PM
annie21
May 27 2013, 09:07 PM

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
That could be true about MR, but she sure didn't have problems emoting in scenes with SC's Daniel, IMO.

As for DH, he may not have understood John's motive with Kristen, but he does know that John has loved Doc for decades. He could have shown that if nothing else.
Unless the director is telling him not to show it.

It's been a long day, so admittedly my brain isn't functioning as quickly as usual, but I'm having a hard time understanding why a director would tell DH not to show any emotions whatsoever. Would this lack of total emotion somehow make us believe that John was falling for Kristen or something? No matter how we slice it, John's motives made/make little sense, and the actor's portrayal didn't help, IMO, "director" or no director.

At least if I saw that he cared for Doc and gave a flying fig that he was/is hurting her, I could probably cut the brother some slack. As it is, I think the only thing Marlena should give him is a swift kick in the same nuts he is trying to give to Kristen.

I could see a director giving DHim coaching to be cold and insensitive as a means to explain John's actions. He knows what he has to do (bed Kristen), and so his distance is a way for him to ensure that reaches that goal (i.e., the less conversations he has with a weepy Marlena, the most of a chance he has to actually follow through with his plan.)

Alternatively, maybe Drake "emoting" was so bad that Alarr, Meng, Corday and de Cazotte all agreed that no acting was better than some acting.

Honestly, I have no idea.
Edited by nickyj12345, May 27 2013, 10:40 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post
Friday, May 24th Daily Discussion · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion