|Viewing Single Post From: Michael Fairman interview with Ken Corday|
|thepadange||Jul 7 2013, 05:02 AM|
Not so sure if I can clearly express my thoughts but I think if KC and TPTB want to draw in new or/and younger audience let's say by shocking them they have to concentrate on visual representation of the stuff much more than they do now (Images have to be kind of shockingly eye-catching). The rape s/l we are talking about here wasn't shocking visually at all. Yeah, it was crazy and shocking but only if you consider the moral point of view, but this kind of shock "hits" (if?) mature viewers with life experience, not younger viewers who never watched the show before. I personally was uncomfortable and a little bit shocked but only because I couldn't understand why in the hell are they doing this, meaning where is the logic in Kristen's behaviour. The only logic I could see so far - TPTB are planning some dramatic reveal scenes for the sweeps eps. I can only hope they will revisit the harem stuff somewhere in the future to explain this but maybe it's too much to hope.
BTW maybe it's just me but while watching this (Kristen/blowgun, Kristen/giant syringe) and some other scenes (Sami shooting Bernardi/razor "in the role of axe") I couldn't help laughing and felt like I was watching some kind of mild dark comedy. Then it was "drama" again. So I think there are some visual experiments on Days. Is it enough to say it's going JER'ish (I would say he was extremely focused on visuality)? IDK. Is it good for a soap? IDK. (And I like Peter Greenaway very much.)
Edited by thepadange, Jul 7 2013, 05:25 AM.
|Michael Fairman interview with Ken Corday · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion|