|Viewing Single Post From: Tuesday, July 23rd Daily Discussion|
|lysie||Jul 24 2013, 01:44 PM|
No, they're just not really relevant. In both cases Sami shot someone and tried (and succeeded) to get away with it. In both cases, her significant other covered for her at the expense of family. In both cases there was a person with a pretty weak motive determined to make her pay and despite the fact that the person had some good points, no one supported them accept for the person going against Sami. Her arrogance and justification are playing out similarly. There are obviously some details that are different. I doubt Adrienne will die and Sami completely side stepped anything legal back then, but the structure of the stories and the characterizations of the main characters involved are all VERY similar.
|Tuesday, July 23rd Daily Discussion · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion|