Viewing Single Post From: Promo for the week February 24th
Feb 25 2014, 10:46 AM
- February 12, 2008
He said it in the Soap Opera Network interview that he and AS did together about EJ, Sami and Abby. It came out at the beginning of this year.
- Feb 25 2014, 10:05 AM
- Feb 24 2014, 10:10 AM
- Feb 24 2014, 07:52 AM
- Feb 24 2014, 07:19 AM
Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
Who is to say for every person like you who is enjoying EJ now, there isn't an EJ fan from before who is no longer a fan because of his actions in this story? I'm not even talking EJami only shippers. I'm talking those EJ fans who have enjoyed him in several pairings because they are a fan of his character but who can't tolerate his recent behavior. Like I mean, what if it's a wash with those people falling off the EJ fan bandwagon? And what if some of these people have been longtime fans.
It's not automatically great just because some 'new' fans are being garnered from this story. It happens with soap characters but it's not always a good thing. So, gaining new fans in and of itself is not necessarily the whole picture.
I'd still bet the farm JS scratched his head a couple times for this story. He's almost always been front burner so that's nothing new for him. He still cares about story even though it's his job to roll with whatever they give him.
JS finds it hard to imagine EJ being in a relationship with someone besides Sami, so yeah, I'm sure ejabby had him scratching his head.
When did JS say that? Is there a clip or interview I can read where he is quoted saying that? I'd be interesting in seeing or reading this in context.I don't recalll having seen or read this although I must admit I just recently started to read/view interviews.I generally just watch the show.Thanks to anyone who can help me with the material.
Okay,I read the portion of the interview provided.No where do I see words from James Scott that he does not imagine EJ in a relationship other than or besides Sami.Is there another interview or clip where those actual words are used or is there speculation this is what he means based on what he said during the portion of the interview cited?