Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]



Hello, soap fans -- and welcome to Daytime Royalty!

For those unfamiliar, we are an uncensored community for fans and lovers of the daytime genre. We have a no-holds-barred atmosphere in regards to the shows, writers, actors etc. but we do not allow member suffering succotash in any form.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member, please log in to your account to access all of our features.

Username:   Password:
Locked Topic
Donald Trumps latest scandal involves Arianne Zucker and DOOL set
Topic Started: Oct 7 2016, 04:26 PM (50,194 Views)
Restless84
Member Avatar


Snowing Fan
Oct 9 2016, 05:31 PM
The leader of Wikileaks is wanted for rape and punk'd Trump supporters the other day saying he had something Election altering against Hillary and Trumps supporters stayed up till 4 am and all he said was he has nothing against Hillary.Just because it's on the Internet doesn't make it real.
:facepalm:
Online Profile Goto Top
 
Snowing Fan
Member Avatar


KweenBoda
Oct 9 2016, 05:29 PM
trojangal
Oct 9 2016, 05:26 PM
Restless84
Oct 9 2016, 05:19 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deephttp://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/23/george-w-bush-white-house-lost-22-million-emails-497373.html[twitter=wikileaks/status/784529660625453057]
Not try I got to offend you but
Wiki Leaks ?
Do you honestly believe everything you hear or read & take it at
face value without questioning the authenticity of the emails & motives of
those leaking this stuff ?

Well evidently the DNC believed the leaks when they got rid of the head of their organization for the crap she spewed in the emails.
After being pressured.
Edited by Snowing Fan, Oct 9 2016, 05:33 PM.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
DesignatedShelley
Member Avatar


Inara Serra
Oct 9 2016, 05:30 PM
"In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here."

Straight from the FBI: no reason to bring criminal charges.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
KweenBoda
Member Avatar


Rosebud
Oct 9 2016, 05:30 PM
Restless84
Oct 9 2016, 04:52 PM
Snowing Fan
Oct 9 2016, 04:37 PM
Republicans love talking about Hillarys emails,but remain silent when while IN office Bush administration lost 22 million emails from 2003-2009.

http://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/23/george-w-bush-white-house-lost-22-million-emails-497373.html

George W. Bush isn't running for President right now. And lets be fair, Bush has been blamed for everything under the sun. Hillary is still blaming Bush for the economy of the last 8 years.
The difference is that the democrats in congress haven't wasted millions of tax payers money investigating Bush, unlike Rep. Trey Gowdy (R).
It was not wasted. Why are others in prison for doing the same as she or even less?
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
jam6242
Member Avatar


[twitter=matthew_ashford/status/785244594636140544]
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
lysie


DesignatedShelley
Oct 9 2016, 05:26 PM
Restless84
Oct 9 2016, 05:19 PM
lysie
Oct 9 2016, 05:12 PM
I find the WikiLeaks e-mails interesting.

Another politician, another sicko:

[twitter=wikileaks/status/784529660625453057]
That's a terribly out of context representation of what was written. Sanders was writing an essay arguing against gender stereotypes and norms. Podesta and Hillary tried to use that against Sanders who was giving her a tougher fight than she had counted on.
You can even tell it's out of context by reading the excerpt of it there. It doesn't actually make much sense.
Online Profile Goto Top
 
Snowing Fan
Member Avatar


KweenBoda
Oct 9 2016, 05:33 PM
Rosebud
Oct 9 2016, 05:30 PM
Restless84
Oct 9 2016, 04:52 PM
The difference is that the democrats in congress haven't wasted millions of tax payers money investigating Bush, unlike Rep. Trey Gowdy (R).
It was not wasted. Why are others in prison for doing the same as she or even less?
Because there was actual proof of guilt.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Inara Serra
Member Avatar
Anyway, this works fine. Honey, you look horrific.

July article investigating Wikileaks and Russia: http://www.smh.com.au/world/us-election/dncleak-five-times-wikileaks-and-russia-have-crossed-paths-20160728-gqfq8b.html
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
laurondo
Member Avatar


jam6242
Oct 9 2016, 05:34 PM
[twitter=matthew_ashford/status/785244594636140544]
Was he even on the show at that time...
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
lysie


laurondo
Oct 9 2016, 05:37 PM
jam6242
Oct 9 2016, 05:34 PM
[twitter=matthew_ashford/status/785244594636140544]
Was he even on the show at that time...
Yeah. It was just before he faked his death.
Online Profile Goto Top
 
Snowing Fan
Member Avatar


No secret Russia is being investigated for interfearing because they want Trump elected.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Rosebud
Member Avatar


KweenBoda
Oct 9 2016, 05:33 PM
Rosebud
Oct 9 2016, 05:30 PM
Restless84
Oct 9 2016, 04:52 PM
The difference is that the democrats in congress haven't wasted millions of tax payers money investigating Bush, unlike Rep. Trey Gowdy (R).
It was not wasted. Why are others in prison for doing the same as she or even less?
Apparently you haven't heard that they found nothing wrong, so yes it was clearly wasted.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Snowing Fan
Member Avatar


https://twitter.com/kurteichenwald/status/785222625320509440

Haha candy joke.😁
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Ophelia
Member Avatar


concerned
Oct 9 2016, 04:47 PM
Oh I am beyond over all those books about how the French do everything better.

I've been to France several times it's not all breadsticks and berets.
I don't disagree. :) I do think some of the attitudes and approaches to food are healthier than in the U.S., though. Some of them.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
nananana7
Member Avatar


Restless84
Oct 9 2016, 05:19 PM
Another politician, another sicko:

[twitter=wikileaks/status/784529660625453057]
DesignatedShelley
Oct 9 2016, 05:26 PM
That's a terribly out of context representation of what was written. Sanders was writing an essay arguing against gender stereotypes and norms.

That was an excerpt from an essay Sanders wrote in
FEBRUARY 1972
in which he was commenting that it was how people are expected to think but not endorsing it.

The full article and nonpartisan explanation on Snopes here:
http://www.snopes.com/bernie-sanders-essay/

To clarify: Someone emailed about it sometime in past two years,
but Sanders's original essay was from 1972.
-- 44 years ago.
Edited by nananana7, Oct 9 2016, 06:01 PM.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
jam6242
Member Avatar


DesignatedShelley
Oct 9 2016, 05:32 PM
Inara Serra
Oct 9 2016, 05:30 PM
"In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here."

Straight from the FBI: no reason to bring criminal charges.
I worked for a federal government agency for many years. Thousands of laptops containing classified information are lost or stolen every year. Employees may be disciplined for that depending on the circumstances, but they are rarely, if ever, prosecuted for it.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Restless84
Member Avatar


DesignatedShelley
Oct 9 2016, 05:32 PM
Inara Serra
Oct 9 2016, 05:30 PM
"In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here."

Straight from the FBI: no reason to bring criminal charges.
Article on Comey's connection to the Clinton Foundation: http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/09/10/exposed-fbi-director-james-comeys-clinton-foundation-connection/
Online Profile Goto Top
 
KweenBoda
Member Avatar


Inara Serra
Oct 9 2016, 05:36 PM
I care more about what the emails contained then who released them (and no I don't believe Trump has a secret thing with Russia). Those emails forever altered my view of the DNC.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
KweenBoda
Member Avatar


Restless84
Oct 9 2016, 05:40 PM
DesignatedShelley
Oct 9 2016, 05:32 PM
Inara Serra
Oct 9 2016, 05:30 PM
"In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here."

Straight from the FBI: no reason to bring criminal charges.
Article on Comey's connection to the Clinton Foundation: http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/09/10/exposed-fbi-director-james-comeys-clinton-foundation-connection/
It came out that lots of people with no clearance saw those classified emails. She should have been disciplined. Funny how everyone got immunity and still refused to testify. And smashed equipment after they were ordered to turn them over. But it's all innocent!
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Restless84
Member Avatar


Snowing Fan
Oct 9 2016, 05:38 PM
No secret Russia is being investigated for interfearing because they want Trump elected.
Like all of this stuff coming out about Trump is not because certain people want Hillary elected? Anyways, WikiLeaks has released damning stuff about Republicans too. Their affiliation to Russia doesn't matter to me because they publish authentic documents.

I guess the Sony e-mails were fake too by some of the logic I'm reading.
Online Profile Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion · Next Topic »
Locked Topic