Follow @DaytimeRoyalty
| Hello, soap fans -- and welcome to Daytime Royalty! For those unfamiliar, we are an uncensored community for fans and lovers of the daytime genre. We have a no-holds-barred atmosphere in regards to the shows, writers, actors etc. but we do not allow member suffering succotash in any form. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member, please log in to your account to access all of our features. |
| Spoilers for the week of October 31st; Updated | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 21 2016, 11:21 PM (41,255 Views) | |
| WillFan | Oct 26 2016, 05:39 PM Post #321 |
![]() ![]()
|
[twitter=nicholsevansfan/status/791408480447963136] [twitter=nicholsevansfan/status/791409210001006592] Edited by WillFan, Oct 26 2016, 05:41 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Rosebud | Oct 26 2016, 05:41 PM Post #322 |
![]() ![]()
|
I agree with everything you said, but if they do go back to Eric and Nicole I wouldn't want Chloe's baby to be theirs. That would be no different than Tatertot's existence to me. If they have to give them a child have them actually create a child the old fashioned way (rewrite her infertility somehow), or even adoption would be better... Eric was a priest in impoverished places so he would know there are many children out there needing parents. |
![]() |
|
| DrewHamilton | Oct 26 2016, 05:46 PM Post #323 |
![]() ![]()
|
Does it actually name the father of Chloe's baby? |
![]() |
|
| esp13 | Oct 26 2016, 05:46 PM Post #324 |
![]()
|
Because that's certainly a story that's never been told about any child of any supercouple ever. |
![]() |
|
| JTClassicSoaps | Oct 26 2016, 05:47 PM Post #325 |
|
J&M and Family Fanatic!
![]()
|
I think Belle might be the only that didn't have abandonment issues, maybe Philip although Kate was missing for a good portion of his first year. |
![]() |
|
| Rosebud | Oct 26 2016, 05:48 PM Post #326 |
![]() ![]()
|
Oh Orpheus, you continue to be a huge disappointment. Posted Image |
![]() |
|
| Rosebud | Oct 26 2016, 05:50 PM Post #327 |
![]() ![]()
|
Followed by a public hanging? ;) |
![]() |
|
| Deverauxfan | Oct 26 2016, 05:51 PM Post #328 |
![]()
Bellarke <3
![]()
|
I think the starlet one might be Shelley Hennig. AS is probably the other one. |
![]() |
|
| AmbernOK | Oct 26 2016, 05:57 PM Post #329 |
![]() ![]()
|
That doesn't make me think the baby is Daniel's!!! Please God...let it be Eric's!! |
![]() |
|
| Mitchapalooza | Oct 26 2016, 05:57 PM Post #330 |
![]()
^ My face watching DAYS
![]()
|
This is some of the dumbest shit I have read yet....what a fucking waste of Shane & Kim. THUMBS DOWN! |
![]() |
|
| Mitchapalooza | Oct 26 2016, 05:59 PM Post #331 |
![]()
^ My face watching DAYS
![]()
|
I'd rather it be about Hope...not this fucktard. |
![]() |
|
| PhoenixRising05 | Oct 26 2016, 06:00 PM Post #332 |
![]()
|
I actually like how the Theresa story explains her name change and revisits her history before she showed up in Salem. Alot of this sounds good on paper but will likely play out terribly onscreen like so much else. |
![]() |
|
| Mitchapalooza | Oct 26 2016, 06:02 PM Post #333 |
![]()
^ My face watching DAYS
![]()
|
I meant that if this baby had to be for Nicole and if it has to be either Eric or Daniel's...then I don't care what convoluted plot is necessary to make it Eric's. Ultimately I would rather this baby be Chloe's and have NOTHING to do with Nicole...but it is PAINFULLY obvious this baby is going to be Nicole's and if that is the case, it NEEDS to be Eric's and NOT Daniels. |
![]() |
|
| Mitchapalooza | Oct 26 2016, 06:03 PM Post #334 |
![]()
^ My face watching DAYS
![]()
|
I disagree...so it explains her name change...big deal. The story still sounds awful. |
![]() |
|
| DrewHamilton | Oct 26 2016, 06:03 PM Post #335 |
![]() ![]()
|
A big glaring problem I have with Shane and Kimberly returning is this seems like such dumb reason to be THE reason Shane and Kimberly return, considering some of the stuff Theresa has gone through that didn't bring her parents back and should've.
Edited by DrewHamilton, Oct 26 2016, 06:04 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Rosebud | Oct 26 2016, 06:05 PM Post #336 |
![]() ![]()
|
Yea, once John is gone I'll be stuck with faux and Marlena. NO THANKS. |
![]() |
|
| Mitchapalooza | Oct 26 2016, 06:06 PM Post #337 |
![]()
^ My face watching DAYS
![]()
|
Props for the return of the St. Lukes set though...too bad it is wasted on Theresa. |
![]() |
|
| Deverauxfan | Oct 26 2016, 06:11 PM Post #338 |
![]()
Bellarke <3
![]()
|
No, but Jason47 did in his thread. ;) :) |
![]() |
|
| Rosebud | Oct 26 2016, 06:11 PM Post #339 |
![]() ![]()
|
Wonder why they're going to a prayer service? Probably arranged to have the Pope come to town to bless Maggie's legs. |
![]() |
|
| Rosebud | Oct 26 2016, 06:14 PM Post #340 |
![]() ![]()
|
Did anyone think it would end differently? |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
|
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion · Next Topic » |















7:53 PM Jul 10