Follow @DaytimeRoyalty
| Hello, soap fans -- and welcome to Daytime Royalty! For those unfamiliar, we are an uncensored community for fans and lovers of the daytime genre. We have a no-holds-barred atmosphere in regards to the shows, writers, actors etc. but we do not allow member bashing in any form. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member, please log in to your account to access all of our features. |
| Days:Weirdwend's spoilers for wk of 8/20 | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Aug 11 2007, 01:19 AM (241 Views) | |
| Angie79 | Aug 11 2007, 01:19 AM Post #1 |
|
Royal Reporter
![]()
|
Steve babysits. Stefano finds a new donor. Max thinks he is about to get lucky. Max is exposed in a casino elevator. Jeremy professes his love to Stephanie. Belle must choose between Shawn and Phillip. http://www.soapnewsandscoops.com/forums/vi...pic.php?t=14635 |
![]() |
|
| PhoenixRising05 | Aug 11 2007, 01:43 AM Post #2 |
|
GET EM STEPH!!
![]()
|
The Max ones are weird but I am interested in the Stefano one alot. Steve babysitting should be fun. |
![]() |
|
| px780 | Aug 11 2007, 02:04 AM Post #3 |
|
Streetcorner Philosopher
![]()
|
The Max ones sound like intentional humor and/or levity. Huh. Go Stefano! Live long enough to explain why you've kept a vendetta reason secret (if it were me, I'd be all up in that person's face making them understand why I'm punishing them, but whatever). |
![]() |
|
| ☼ Jinx ☼ | Aug 11 2007, 09:01 AM Post #4 |
|
Live. Love. Laugh. ♥
![]()
|
I CAN'T WAIT to see Steve babysit. Its just something about his personality that intrigues me to see how his ways with a child differ. The last episode I saw (not sure if its aired in the US), was when Kayla presented the idea of taking in the child temporarily. The child services lady asked if that was okay with Steve. And, he said, "does he have 10 fingers and toes?" :lol: |
![]() |
|
| Jonatha | Aug 11 2007, 09:44 AM Post #5 |
![]()
|
I agree with you. I think Sheffer has kept Steve in the same character mode for the most part. Steve doesn't seem to have changed much. I love that. Can't wait to see him with the little one. I've been turned off of Mary Beth for a while now until yesterday and her scene with the baby. I got goosebumps... Awwwww. That little guy is so cute. :D |
![]() |
|
| IMissAremid | Aug 11 2007, 11:56 AM Post #6 |
![]()
After all... tomorrow is another day!
![]()
|
The Max ones sound obnoxious. It was redundant when they had Bo streak for the bet when they had just had Lucas trapped outside the hotel room in his boxers a couple months ago and I bet we're getting something similar again with Max. WTF is wrong with this show that everything has to be rehashed CONSTANTLY? |
![]() |
|
| PhoenixRising05 | Aug 11 2007, 01:22 PM Post #7 |
|
GET EM STEPH!!
![]()
|
They do it for fun and laughs. Surprisingly, it's low on the list of things people complain about overall really. Mot fans actually want more of that stuff for their couples and characters. I can see why one would think it's silly, though. It's not really rehashing. It's just a recurring theme, it seems. |
![]() |
|
| IMissAremid | Aug 11 2007, 01:38 PM Post #8 |
![]()
After all... tomorrow is another day!
![]()
|
I don't mind the show doing things for fun and laughs as long as they mix it up a little. You don't have to do the same thing over and over. Just like for drama and suspense the show doesn't have to set off non-fatal bombs over and over. There are other plot devices out there that can provide that. To me, it's just another example of the lack of imagination of TPTB right now in everything they write... along with the repetitive lines (pry it from my cold dead hands x2, Elvis has left the building joke x3 or 4) and even the recycling of Candy Cane as a hooker name. MIX IT UP. This all just feels like the show is going in circles. |
![]() |
|
| DrewHamilton | Aug 11 2007, 03:27 PM Post #9 |
![]() ![]()
|
I can see where you're coming from, IMA. However, I don't have a problem with it. At least we're seeing Max now. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · GH: News, Spoilers & Discussion · Next Topic » |












9:59 PM May 22