|Hello, soap fans -- and welcome to Daytime Royalty!|
For those unfamiliar, we are an uncensored community for fans and lovers of the daytime genre. We have a no-holds-barred atmosphere in regards to the shows, writers, actors etc. but we do not allow member bashing in any form.
You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.
Join our community!
If you're already a member, please log in to your account to access all of our features.
|TVG: Can - Top 10 Things that Need fixin on soaps|
|Tweet Topic Started: Jan 9 2008, 12:50 PM (407 Views)|
|ljacks13||Jan 9 2008, 12:50 PM Post #1|
2008 New Year's Resolutions
By Nelson Branco
Think you had a lot on your to-do list? Check out the Top 10 issues that need fixin’ on soaps!
With the death knell of daytime soap opera quietly ringing, TVGuide.ca is unveiling New Year's resolutions that every producer and writer should make part of their 2008 resolve.
10. Don't rewrite history — unless you're a pro
Repeat after me: “We, the soap opera community, promise never to re-write soap history, unless, of course, it makes complete storyline sense and/or fills in plot holes left by previous regimes.” Also, reminding viewers of your soap characters rich past is easy — tune into One Life to Live to see how it’s done properly. I never tire of hearing of the Iguazu Falls because it means Tina Lord is on the minds of the writers which ignites my curiosity and interest more than any mob shooting ever could.
9. Moratorium on rape storylines/redeeming rapists
Rape is not a plot twist. It’s a serious crime that should only be addressed in a storyline completely and organically devoted to the aftermath of this deplorable act of violence. Yes, Days of Our Lives we mean you! And stop redeeming rapists while you’re at it, too. Newsflash: soaps are a woman’s medium and not a misogynistic, masturbatory medium for perverts. Yes, we mean you too, Passions!
8. More extras
One of the reasons I can’t take Guiding Light seriously is the fact that in every public setting, there is no one in the background. Springfield is deader than my sex life — if that’s at all possible! Seriously, having no extras in the background pulls me out of the narrative and foreground. Let’s hope soaps’ new production mantra — to shoot on location more often to save on crew and in-studio costs — fixes this. At the very least, set your stories in a character’s home and not in a ghost town. In a word, it’s depressing to visually be reminded that budgets rule the reel world when all I want to do is escape from the real one.
7. Don’t fool your audience — especially when they are smarter than you
Days may be on the upswing creatively, but I will never trust this show again. Two words: Drake Hogestyn (John). It’s lost its credibility and integrity by lying to their audience that John was dead-dead, only to bring him back in a publicity ruse grown terribly awry. Too bad, because a soap death can be the most powerful way to draw an audience in. Moreover, it’s sad because it’s hard to invest in characters who are dumb enough to believe that anyone in Salem actually dies. And that’s the real tragedy here.
6. Stop firing veterans and/or turning them into ghostly/ghastly reincarnations
Stuart Damon (Alan, GH), Jerry Douglas (John, Y&R), and “forced-into-retirement” Phil Carey (ex-Asa, OLTL) were all victims of this cost-saving atrocity that is increasingly becoming more popular with networks. Who’s next — Leslie Charleson (Monica, GH), Elizabeth Hubbard (Lucinda, ATWT), and Justin Deas (Buzz, GL)? As for Douglas, what was the point in letting the actor go when his character is on-screen more than he ever was when he was actually alive? I. Don’t. Get. It. Would the film world write off Jack Nicholson or Meryl Streep?
5. Eliminate jerky hand-held camera work
One only had to watch All My Children’s nauseating, alcohol-induced camera work to know that daytime should never experiment with this production maelstrom — ever again.
4. Fight for Emmy reform/submit actors in proper categories
The daytime community really needs to officially define who a supporting actor and lead actor is so that the Emmy race can properly recognize the best in acting. I realize soaps are a different beast, but in my mind I always refer to Gone With the Wind as the definer: Vivien Leigh is a lead actress, and Hattie McDaniel is a supporting actress. Using that, I would define Erika Slezak (Viki, OLTL) as a lead, and Patricia Elliott (Renee, OLTL) as a supporting. Perhaps when an actor is both lead and supporting, as can often happen on soaps, the performer can decide which storyline he/she wants to be considered for and submit accordingly. Categories mean something, damn it! Also, a new daytime committee comprised of soap’s elite needs to be reinstituted so proper Emmy reform can happen instead of applying a bunch of Band-aids to key problems the Academy seems destined to make. If we can’t fix the Emmy Awards, world peace never stands a chance!
3. Character-driven storylines, puh-lease
Nothing is worse on soaps than watching a storyline that isn’t mined from character. Plot-driven stories do not work — why is it taking decades for soap writers to realize this? Living soap legend Agnes Nixon brilliantly noted that an audience will believe anything you write, as long as they understand why. Also, Nixon’s writing mantra should be followed at all times: Make them laugh, make them cry, and most importantly, make them wait. And to be clear — by waiting, the soap icon doesn’t mean threatening a character’s life in a Friday cliffhanger (especially when fans know a star’s contract isn’t up for renewal), but whether or not the character will learn and grow — and find happiness. Introducing psychology is a great place to start — The Bold and the Beautiful’s head writer-producer Bradley Bell is a master at this.
2. Stop rehashing plot information in every scene
When I tune into a new show midway through the plot, I don't turn the channel. In fact, I become more intrigued and obsessed with putting the pieces of the puzzle together that I keep watching until I figure out all the story threads by paying attention to the nuances in dialogue and acting. It's actually fun when you aren't force-fed information like a baby. Regardless, figuring out the elements at play in a storyline isn't rocket science; viewers are experts at soap storytelling and boast great instincts. It usually takes a few episodes to figure it all out — and isn't that what you want: a viewer to keep tuning in? When I watch a soap that explains everything that has transpired in the past two decades without moving the plot forward, I change the channel. Get it? There are more creative ways to educate viewers on the recent history of its characters without boring us to death. Again, tune into OLTL to see how it¹s done.
1. Fill out a minority report
Blame HBO. As former Brothers & Sisters producer Greg Berlanti, the creator of Dirty Sexy Money, told The Advocate recently, “when you live in a post-Six Feet Under world," he reasons, "it's kind of hard to go back to drawing gay characters like they're stereotypes again." Viewers expect realistic canvases and storylines — and anything else isn’t worth our time. It explains why fans are ditching soaps in droves and flocking to cable and prime-time TV for entertainment. Yes, prime time still has a long way to go regarding representing minorities in its stories, but it’s light years ahead of daytime (ironically, it used to be the other way around). Tell real stories about real people —and the audience will come. It’s sad that there were more minorities on soaps in the 1980s and 1990s — heck, there was even an all-black soap called Generations on NBC in 1989 — than there is now. And it’s what, 2008? For shame. It’s not that hard, people. Echoing Victoria Rowell’s (ex-Drucilla, Y&R) rant: “daytime is racist…” and I’ll add homophobic, and sexist to the list, too!
|Mason||Jan 9 2008, 01:01 PM Post #2|
||Excellent list. I agree 100%.|
|oakdalelover||Jan 9 2008, 02:21 PM Post #3|
Very good list!
I would give baby stories a rest.
No more DNA tests,switched paternity tests,mishandled adoptions and miscarriages for a while please.
|ArizonaDaze||Jan 9 2008, 02:51 PM Post #4|
||Wow, somebody that gets it. :hail:|
|ArizonaDaze||Jan 9 2008, 02:52 PM Post #5|
Yeah, that too.
|PhoenixRising05||Jan 9 2008, 05:21 PM Post #6|
||I don't think Logan gets anything and I dislike him big time but this is a good list and I hope all the soaps take a look at this and apply it to their future plans. I don't agree with every detail of it but he really presented alot of valid points.|
|Mason||Jan 9 2008, 05:24 PM Post #7|
||LoL, the reason you agree with it so much is probably because Logan wasn't the one who made the list. It was Nelson Branco from Canada's article.|
|OneBadKitty||Jan 9 2008, 05:35 PM Post #8|
OMG, this is beautiful! :hail:
|Steve Frame||Jan 9 2008, 05:39 PM Post #9|
Very very good list. This is one of Nelson's best columns. He hits it all on the head for me.
I would add another thing to the list too.
#11 is James' no more baby stories.
#12 is for fans and TPTB get over this "fake" and "new" or "nu" or "faux" characters. I see that as another thing that has hurt soaps and is part of the fan base thing I guess. I grew up as a fan of soaps that when roles were recast that was just part of it. We didn't call them fake or faux or nu or new. When Jacqueline Courtney was replaced as Alice on AW, we just got used to the replacement.
I just hate when fans do that today and now TPTB are playing into it with all this "the real" Greenlee returns and all. It's sickening to see them condoning this. Just another long line of mistakes the hacks who run soaps today are making.
|OneBadKitty||Jan 9 2008, 05:42 PM Post #10|
Damn skippy! :hail:
|PhoenixRising05||Jan 9 2008, 05:53 PM Post #11|
Wow...your right. I saw TVGuide and just assumed and didn't read the top.
Well, that explains alot. Still, don't care for Nelson either but this is pretty good. Steve's points are good too. It's annoying when people do that with recasts.
|into_the_skyline||Jan 9 2008, 06:36 PM Post #12|
I agree! We already know soaps have a large minority and male (presumably gay) fanbase, but they give us absolutely nothing. How does this make sense? The majority of their viewers are also older, but you don't see the vets featured! Pure insanity and prejudice if you ask me.
Another thing he should add is no baby stories! Look at ATWT...
|Ponz||Jan 9 2008, 06:48 PM Post #13|
Truer words have never been spoken.
|Gregorzick||Jan 9 2008, 07:50 PM Post #14|
This article has to be one of the best criticisms of soaps I've read in quite a long time.
Bravo, Mr. Branco, Bravo!!!! :hail: :cheer:
His points about GL's lack of extras and AMC's lousy camera work were oh so right on the money. And Yes, I believe the networks can afford some decent cameras as well as a few day players, no matter how much TPTB cry about the soaps being in the poorhouse!!! :eyeroll: :blah:
|1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)|
|« Previous Topic · Y&R & B&B: News, Spoilers & Discussion · Next Topic »|