Follow @DaytimeRoyalty
| Hello, soap fans -- and welcome to Daytime Royalty! For those unfamiliar, we are an uncensored community for fans and lovers of the daytime genre. We have a no-holds-barred atmosphere in regards to the shows, writers, actors etc. but we do not allow member bashing in any form. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member, please log in to your account to access all of our features. |
| Days: Upcoming tidbits! | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Oct 27 2008, 11:15 AM (3,160 Views) | |
| cjknick | Oct 28 2008, 12:04 PM Post #41 |
![]()
|
I think they have too many 30 something males characters too in relation to female 30 something characters .... I suppose Max and Chelsea could get together again. We also have Daniel he is sort of in that category! |
![]() |
|
| ArizonaDaze | Oct 28 2008, 01:08 PM Post #42 |
![]()
|
I can't really picture Daniel in that group as he is early 40s. Of course that didn't stop them before with Chelsea! Days has long been lacking in the 25-35 age range. |
![]() |
|
| Nicole Dimera | Oct 28 2008, 01:35 PM Post #43 |
![]()
|
Kate and Daniel would have worked if they never did the Chelsea and Daniel thing. It's just tainted now. |
![]() |
|
| Mason | Oct 28 2008, 03:52 PM Post #44 |
![]()
|
I agree. The instant pairing with Chelsea pretty much killed Daniel's character right out of the gate. |
![]() |
|
| Emma Frost | Oct 28 2008, 04:33 PM Post #45 |
![]()
|
I wouldn't mind if they brought back Mimi and stuck her in the 30 something category. But yes, there are definitely too many men right now in that group. Especially with the rumors that Chloe is going to be hooking up with Dr. Dude. Thanks OBK for the scoops!! I love them!!! |
![]() |
|
| Sindacco | Oct 28 2008, 04:36 PM Post #46 |
![]()
|
Why does everything have to be about couples and pairing charactes up? You act as if they wouldn't have a purpose if they aren't together with someone. |
![]() |
|
| PhoenixRising05 | Oct 29 2008, 01:58 AM Post #47 |
|
GET EM STEPH!!
![]()
|
It's a shame, isn't it? That is what happens when a show relies too heavily on the same supercouples for so long and relies heavily on the supercouple model for so long, in general. Everytime someone comes on there is always speculation over who they will be paired with. It's all about the paring, which is why when Hogan took over people had such trouble with his writing. He was writing for characters and not couples and that kind of direction was lost on many fans. I know it will be said that Days is a couples oriented show but that is because it's never broken out of that mold. It used to be different. The show was character-driven, not couple-driven. Hell, these couples came together in the 80's and some of the 90's because of the character-based writing that suited their getting together. Now we don't get that kind of writing. Even under B&C...they had to tell stories for John AND Marlena. For Bo AND Hope. It could never be just for Hope or John or Bo or Marlena. More evidence of how much the writers are limited nowadays. |
![]() |
|
| ginababe | Oct 29 2008, 02:15 AM Post #48 |
|
BANNED
![]()
|
LMAO! When I initially read the title of this post I thought it read "upcoming IDIOTS" I was like "okay, here we go!" :lol: |
![]() |
|
| OneBadKitty | Oct 29 2008, 12:59 PM Post #49 |
![]() ![]()
|
LOL Gina! Actually we are already watching the idiots. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion · Next Topic » |













3:03 AM May 25