Follow @DaytimeRoyalty
| Hello, soap fans -- and welcome to Daytime Royalty! For those unfamiliar, we are an uncensored community for fans and lovers of the daytime genre. We have a no-holds-barred atmosphere in regards to the shows, writers, actors etc. but we do not allow member suffering succotash in any form. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member, please log in to your account to access all of our features. |
| Major Melrose Place Teaser!; Guess who meets their maker? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 17 2009, 08:13 AM (3,654 Views) | |
| KMan101 | May 21 2009, 06:44 PM Post #61 |
![]()
|
They could have just killed Lexie off. Have a red-head dead in the pool and then explain it away over a few episodes. I get they want to use "flashbacks" but it seems like such a waste to bring Syd back from the dead, go through all the trouble to explain it, only to have her dead in the first episode. I'm only hoping we'll have a big twist in the end and Syd turns up alive for the third time, LoL! |
![]() |
|
| Nubia | May 21 2009, 07:22 PM Post #62 |
![]()
The Queen
![]()
|
The whole twist would be less absurd if they weren't bringing back a character from the dead, just to kill her again. I know many of my friends were excited about Sydney's return. I fear this is going to leave a bad taste in many people's mouths. |
![]() |
|
| Kenny | May 21 2009, 07:24 PM Post #63 |
![]()
|
It'll definitely leave a bad taste. It's a slap in the face to fans. I can hear the writers already. "Ha! We fooled you!" |
![]() |
|
| Mason | May 21 2009, 07:31 PM Post #64 |
![]()
|
Agreed. This show has already pissed me off majorly and it hasn't even started yet. |
![]() |
|
| Kenny | May 21 2009, 07:31 PM Post #65 |
![]()
|
It's also stupid to play it out like they are -- killing her in the first episode and then explaining the mystery through flashbacks all season. I mean, everybody knows what the outcome will be: Sydney dead. Beyond that, why would anyone care about the lame backstory to it? Talk about knocking all the wind out of the sails. |
![]() |
|
| Mason | May 21 2009, 07:33 PM Post #66 |
![]()
|
I'm going to predict right now that Michael's the killer. And then I'll be doubly pissed off. |
![]() |
|
| darraholic | May 21 2009, 09:02 PM Post #67 |
![]() ![]()
|
I do think the killer will be someone from the original show. I doubt they'll make any of the new characters the killer. |
![]() |
|
| Kenny | May 21 2009, 09:30 PM Post #68 |
![]()
|
Nah, it'll be a new character, IMO. It's apparent that they don't want the show to be "all about the originals," hence Sydney's getting killed in the first five minutes. The killer will definitely be a newbie. |
![]() |
|
| Mason | May 21 2009, 09:33 PM Post #69 |
![]()
|
That's exactly why I think it will be an old character - that way, whoever the killer is, they can just ship them off to prison, and it'll be one less original they'll have to worry about. |
![]() |
|
| Kenny | May 21 2009, 09:48 PM Post #70 |
![]()
|
Hmm... good point. |
![]() |
|
| KMan101 | May 21 2009, 09:52 PM Post #71 |
![]()
|
http://www.tvguide.com/News/Melrose-Place-preview-1006271.aspx Awesome explanations. David's existence explained (I still don't get how Michael can have a 20-something kid) and there will be a NEW Shooters! Sweet! I always hated when they got rid of Shooters in the original and we were stuck with Kyle's lame restaurant and club. |
![]() |
|
| Mason | May 21 2009, 10:04 PM Post #72 |
![]()
|
I didn't understand their explanation for David and Michael at all, actually. I'm just as confused as before - if not moreso. I'm very happy that Shooters will be back! That was as much a part of MP as the Peach Pit was to BH 90210. Edited by Mason, May 21 2009, 10:11 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Nubia | May 21 2009, 10:13 PM Post #73 |
![]()
The Queen
![]()
|
I think this could only work if we found out that Michael got someone pregnant before he was married to Jane (Which wouldn't be surprising). I also wonder if they will reference the children he had with Taylor and Jane. |
![]() |
|
| into_the_skyline | May 22 2009, 02:37 AM Post #74 |
![]()
|
This show would've been DOA had Heather Locklear returned only to be killed off in the pilot. They should be happy she turned them down. |
![]() |
|
| paddylad | May 22 2009, 03:48 AM Post #75 |
![]()
|
As this was suppose to be a big secret why has it been leaked so blatantly. The show bio then the clip meant it was sooo simple to geuss it was Sydney who was dead. Is this tog et people talking all summer or could it be a red herring maybe |
![]() |
|
| Andre | May 22 2009, 03:05 PM Post #76 |
![]()
|
So is Sydney some sort of major character from the original series? I say kill her and dance on her grave. :P |
![]() |
|
| Kenny | May 22 2009, 03:18 PM Post #77 |
![]()
|
LoL, you'll be stoned for that! |
![]() |
|
| px780 | Jun 19 2009, 09:14 PM Post #78 |
|
Streetcorner Philosopher
![]()
|
And so goes my interest in the show...even if Jane's coming back or whatever. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Primetime Discussion · Next Topic » |














2:00 PM Jul 11