Follow @DaytimeRoyalty
| Hello, soap fans -- and welcome to Daytime Royalty! For those unfamiliar, we are an uncensored community for fans and lovers of the daytime genre. We have a no-holds-barred atmosphere in regards to the shows, writers, actors etc. but we do not allow member suffering succotash in any form. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member, please log in to your account to access all of our features. |
| Spoilers for the week of January 23rd; *Updated 1/20* | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 11 2012, 04:23 AM (33,777 Views) | |
| jtsahottie | Jan 18 2012, 02:07 PM Post #221 |
![]()
If I woke from a coma and Channing Tatum told me he was my husband... I'd Believe Him!
![]()
|
You think Nicole is thh unstable one :shrug: I think Sami needs mental help...REALLY BAD> :shame: |
![]() |
|
| jtsahottie | Jan 18 2012, 02:10 PM Post #222 |
![]()
If I woke from a coma and Channing Tatum told me he was my husband... I'd Believe Him!
![]()
|
I don't really care about Sydney being Sami's or not...Sami fucked EJ in a one night stand and got preggers... then she's knocked up...oh well, her bad. I just would like Nicole to have a baby because she would actually care about them. That said I amd still waiting for Johnny's parentage to change because that was just WRONG. However again anything can happen on a soap and for all we know Sami could have had sleepwalk sex with Lucas when he got out of prison and Sydney could be his. Anything's better than what we have currently. |
![]() |
|
| Dazefan4now | Jan 18 2012, 02:16 PM Post #223 |
![]()
|
Does anyone think Will could actually be Austins, and that why they've brought him back? |
![]() |
|
| lysie | Jan 18 2012, 02:22 PM Post #224 |
![]()
|
For the love of Pete, people. |
![]() |
|
| mer4santo | Jan 18 2012, 02:25 PM Post #225 |
![]()
|
I do love Pete....so much that I'd gaslight his wife in order to kidnap him and keep him in captivity in my basement for eternity. |
![]() |
|
| Lil | Jan 18 2012, 02:31 PM Post #226 |
![]()
|
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: |
![]() |
|
| MissLola | Jan 18 2012, 02:33 PM Post #227 |
![]()
|
Please, no more who's your daddy/ mommy storylines!!!!! :soapbox: |
![]() |
|
| Lil | Jan 18 2012, 02:35 PM Post #228 |
![]()
|
Seriously. No more babies at all for now! (especially since we rarely see the ones that are on now) How about some old school Stefano basement torture microchips implanted in the brains and such?! lol Edited by Lil, Jan 18 2012, 02:35 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| LuvingLumi | Jan 18 2012, 02:38 PM Post #229 |
![]()
Come on Ron, We are counting on YOU !!
![]()
|
When aren't serious fan-wanks not happening on this board? It's like an every day occurance around here (there is an entire thread devoted to just that).....but realistically, this particular story is really not THAT far fetched. This story has as many loose ends as the Lucas being the shooter did. Some of us were discussing the Will being a shooter in a thread at Sony about 2 years ago and one poster in particular told us that if we thought that the 2007 shooting was ever going to be revisited we were basically delusional.. I even tried to reason with this person about why I thought it could be possible given the many signs that Will was the possible shooter and not Lucas, I listed the signs and even posted a transcript of the dialogue. I was told that the writers would never do that, well we see now that they certainly could. Frankly, sometimes the viewers come up with the best ideas, as witnessed by the Will being the shooter storyline, many viewers from across the board were actually happy with that twist, it wasn't just a fanbase that was happy, many fans thought that twist/revelation was brilliant and would lead to some pretty good drama for months to come. |
![]() |
|
| SocRMum1 | Jan 18 2012, 02:39 PM Post #230 |
![]()
Much prefers sweevil, snarky EJ over Father Figure Fucktard Eejiot.
![]()
|
I've never met a Pete I didn't love. |
![]() |
|
| LuvingLumi | Jan 18 2012, 02:41 PM Post #231 |
![]()
Come on Ron, We are counting on YOU !!
![]()
|
My husband and my son's name is Pete :D |
![]() |
|
| SoapGal1 | Jan 18 2012, 02:41 PM Post #232 |
![]() ![]()
|
I, myself, am particularly fond of the Peter......oh wait.....that's not what you meant. Or is it? |
![]() |
|
| SocRMum1 | Jan 18 2012, 02:45 PM Post #233 |
![]()
Much prefers sweevil, snarky EJ over Father Figure Fucktard Eejiot.
![]()
|
Try to keep up, will ya?? :fp2: |
![]() |
|
| SoapGal1 | Jan 18 2012, 02:48 PM Post #234 |
![]() ![]()
|
How the hell am I suppose to keep up with all the fanwanking?? As a non-shipper of any coupling at the moment, I find it hard to wade thru the shipping. Now, about this Peter..... |
![]() |
|
| mer4santo | Jan 18 2012, 02:49 PM Post #235 |
![]()
|
You mean Peter Blake? No, MR requested that he be wiped from your memory. Unfortunately there is a very long waiting list. |
![]() |
|
| SocRMum1 | Jan 18 2012, 02:56 PM Post #236 |
![]()
Much prefers sweevil, snarky EJ over Father Figure Fucktard Eejiot.
![]()
|
You make a good point. ^o) But let it be said that a good Peter should stand out all on it's own. :$ |
![]() |
|
| lysie | Jan 18 2012, 03:02 PM Post #237 |
![]()
|
The spoilers are in the first post. Discuss those. I'll start. Hope turns to Doug and Julie. Were they supposed to already be out of the country or is this were that's established? |
![]() |
|
| SoapGal1 | Jan 18 2012, 03:08 PM Post #238 |
![]() ![]()
|
Marlena has a disasterous lunch... What did she get a bad egg salad sandwich? |
![]() |
|
| mer4santo | Jan 18 2012, 03:12 PM Post #239 |
![]()
|
This sounds wrong on so many levels. |
![]() |
|
| daisy132 | Jan 18 2012, 03:15 PM Post #240 |
![]()
|
No, I don't find that strange at all. She ended up there to be introduced to Dr. Baker, who would be involved in the whole storyline. His money kept streaming through Nicole, since she was Mrs. EJ Dimera, and he was sworn to secrecy throughout the storyline. Stephano found out about Nicole's plans later, and saw to it that she carried them through, so that he could get SAMI's child since he knew she had no intention of ever letting EJ have contact with it. Some have implied that Stephano caused the miscarriage through the strawberries she ate, but why in the world would he do that at all?? Nicole was pregnant with EJ's baby, she worshiped EJ AND Stephano, and was super excited to give them a Dimera heir. Compare that with Sami, who kept her pregnancy hidden, had no intention of ever telling the Dimeras anything about it, and put herself in protective custody in order to accomplish that. If Stephano caused ANYONE's miscarriage to bring the baby to term, it would have been Sami's. Changing Johnny's and Sydney's paternity would serve only ONE purpose: to sever all ties between Sami and EJ, and have them paired with Lucas/Nicole which IMO this is what this whole drive to see it happen is all about, because the potential for great storylines involving the Brady/Dimera children would be very great, and it would only benefit the show. Edited by daisy132, Jan 18 2012, 05:02 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() Our users say it best: "Zetaboards is the best forum service I have ever used." Learn More · Sign-up for Free |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion · Next Topic » |
















9:19 AM Jul 11