Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]



Hello, soap fans -- and welcome to Daytime Royalty!

For those unfamiliar, we are an uncensored community for fans and lovers of the daytime genre. We have a no-holds-barred atmosphere in regards to the shows, writers, actors etc. but we do not allow member suffering succotash in any form.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member, please log in to your account to access all of our features.

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Spoilers for the week of January 23rd; *Updated 1/20*
Topic Started: Jan 11 2012, 04:23 AM (33,777 Views)
jtsahottie
Member Avatar
If I woke from a coma and Channing Tatum told me he was my husband... I'd Believe Him!

daisy132
Jan 18 2012, 01:46 PM
jtsahottie
Jan 18 2012, 12:33 PM
SocRMum1
Jan 18 2012, 12:25 PM
magicsteacher
Jan 18 2012, 12:08 PM

Quoting limited to 4 levels deepall
Anything can - and does - happen on soaps. But the implausibility of this for me is that we (the viewers) watched both Mia and Sami give birth on the same day - and watched as Nicole took Mia's baby to the clinic and Doc Baker brought Sami's baby out from the delivery room to work on her. Nicole then begged him to switch the newborns that were both right there in the same room the whole time. When would Baker have had the opportunity to somehow switch Sami's dead baby out with Nicole's (apparently severely premature baby that has been in neo natal care up to now) and not have Nicole notice? And what are the chances those things would have all worked out so that two of the babies would be born on the same day, one would die and Nicole's would just happen to be the perfect size and development to take it's place? And how would Baker have known that Nicole would have asked to switch the babies or that Sami would handily be delivering hers randomly in his clinic on that very day?

Like I said, anything could happen. But there are holes the size of Texas in that scenario.
But Sami's baby was taken away soon after birth because she wasn't breathing.... than brought back....
How do we know that that baby Dr. Baker waas working on was indeed Sami's babyb...we don't..... hmmmm.
It really is no big deal that the baby wasn't breathing. It's not very uncommon at all for babies not to be breathing at first. IMO it was just an excuse written in for Dr. Baker to leave the room and meet with Nicole and do the switch, nothing more.

I think Nicole is going to have a breakdown of sorts, and maybe her interraction with Sydney is to reinforce that's she's still "unstable" and very fragile.
You think Nicole is thh unstable one :shrug: I think Sami needs mental help...REALLY BAD> :shame:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
jtsahottie
Member Avatar
If I woke from a coma and Channing Tatum told me he was my husband... I'd Believe Him!

I don't really care about Sydney being Sami's or not...Sami fucked EJ in a one night stand and got preggers... then she's knocked up...oh well, her bad.
I just would like Nicole to have a baby because she would actually care about them. That said I amd still waiting for Johnny's parentage to change because that was just WRONG. However again anything can happen on a soap and for all we know Sami could have had sleepwalk sex with Lucas when he got out of prison and Sydney could be his. Anything's better than what we have currently.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dazefan4now
Member Avatar


Does anyone think Will could actually be Austins, and that why they've brought him back?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
lysie


For the love of Pete, people.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
mer4santo
Member Avatar


lysie
Jan 18 2012, 02:22 PM
For the love of Pete, people.
I do love Pete....so much that I'd gaslight his wife in order to kidnap him and keep him in captivity in my basement for eternity.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Lil
Member Avatar


mer4santo
Jan 18 2012, 02:25 PM
lysie
Jan 18 2012, 02:22 PM
For the love of Pete, people.
I do love Pete....so much that I'd gaslight his wife in order to kidnap him and keep him in captivity in my basement for eternity.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
MissLola
Member Avatar


Please, no more who's your daddy/ mommy storylines!!!!! :soapbox:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Lil
Member Avatar


alex
Jan 18 2012, 02:33 PM
Please, no more who's your daddy/ mommy storylines!!!!! :soapbox:
Seriously. No more babies at all for now! (especially since we rarely see the ones that are on now) How about some old school Stefano basement torture microchips implanted in the brains and such?! lol
Edited by Lil, Jan 18 2012, 02:35 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
LuvingLumi
Member Avatar
Come on Ron, We are counting on YOU !!

mer4santo
Jan 18 2012, 02:13 PM
There are some serious fan-wanks going on in this thread. I hope no one at the show is listening.
When aren't serious fan-wanks not happening on this board? It's like an every day occurance around here (there is an entire thread devoted to just that).....but realistically, this particular story is really not THAT far fetched. This story has as many loose ends as the Lucas being the shooter did. Some of us were discussing the Will being a shooter in a thread at Sony about 2 years ago and one poster in particular told us that if we thought that the 2007 shooting was ever going to be revisited we were basically delusional.. I even tried to reason with this person about why I thought it could be possible given the many signs that Will was the possible shooter and not Lucas, I listed the signs and even posted a transcript of the dialogue. I was told that the writers would never do that, well we see now that they certainly could. Frankly, sometimes the viewers come up with the best ideas, as witnessed by the Will being the shooter storyline, many viewers from across the board were actually happy with that twist, it wasn't just a fanbase that was happy, many fans thought that twist/revelation was brilliant and would lead to some pretty good drama for months to come.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SocRMum1
Member Avatar
Much prefers sweevil, snarky EJ over Father Figure Fucktard Eejiot.

mer4santo
Jan 18 2012, 02:25 PM
lysie
Jan 18 2012, 02:22 PM
For the love of Pete, people.
I do love Pete....so much that I'd gaslight his wife in order to kidnap him and keep him in captivity in my basement for eternity.
I've never met a Pete I didn't love.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
LuvingLumi
Member Avatar
Come on Ron, We are counting on YOU !!

SocRMum1
Jan 18 2012, 02:39 PM
mer4santo
Jan 18 2012, 02:25 PM
lysie
Jan 18 2012, 02:22 PM
For the love of Pete, people.
I do love Pete....so much that I'd gaslight his wife in order to kidnap him and keep him in captivity in my basement for eternity.
I've never met a Pete I didn't love.
My husband and my son's name is Pete :D
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SoapGal1
Member Avatar


SocRMum1
Jan 18 2012, 02:39 PM
mer4santo
Jan 18 2012, 02:25 PM
lysie
Jan 18 2012, 02:22 PM
For the love of Pete, people.
I do love Pete....so much that I'd gaslight his wife in order to kidnap him and keep him in captivity in my basement for eternity.
I've never met a Pete I didn't love.
I, myself, am particularly fond of the Peter......oh wait.....that's not what you meant.

Or is it?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SocRMum1
Member Avatar
Much prefers sweevil, snarky EJ over Father Figure Fucktard Eejiot.

SoapGal1
Jan 18 2012, 02:41 PM
SocRMum1
Jan 18 2012, 02:39 PM
mer4santo
Jan 18 2012, 02:25 PM
lysie
Jan 18 2012, 02:22 PM
For the love of Pete, people.
I do love Pete....so much that I'd gaslight his wife in order to kidnap him and keep him in captivity in my basement for eternity.
I've never met a Pete I didn't love.
I, myself, am particularly fond of the Peter......oh wait.....that's not what you meant.

Or is it?
Try to keep up, will ya?? :fp2:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SoapGal1
Member Avatar


SocRMum1
Jan 18 2012, 02:45 PM
SoapGal1
Jan 18 2012, 02:41 PM
SocRMum1
Jan 18 2012, 02:39 PM
mer4santo
Jan 18 2012, 02:25 PM

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
I've never met a Pete I didn't love.
I, myself, am particularly fond of the Peter......oh wait.....that's not what you meant.

Or is it?
Try to keep up, will ya?? :fp2:
How the hell am I suppose to keep up with all the fanwanking??

As a non-shipper of any coupling at the moment, I find it hard to wade thru the shipping.

Now, about this Peter.....
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
mer4santo
Member Avatar


SoapGal1
Jan 18 2012, 02:41 PM
SocRMum1
Jan 18 2012, 02:39 PM
mer4santo
Jan 18 2012, 02:25 PM
lysie
Jan 18 2012, 02:22 PM
For the love of Pete, people.
I do love Pete....so much that I'd gaslight his wife in order to kidnap him and keep him in captivity in my basement for eternity.
I've never met a Pete I didn't love.
I, myself, am particularly fond of the Peter......oh wait.....that's not what you meant.

Or is it?
You mean Peter Blake? No, MR requested that he be wiped from your memory. Unfortunately there is a very long waiting list.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SocRMum1
Member Avatar
Much prefers sweevil, snarky EJ over Father Figure Fucktard Eejiot.

SoapGal1
Jan 18 2012, 02:48 PM
SocRMum1
Jan 18 2012, 02:45 PM
SoapGal1
Jan 18 2012, 02:41 PM
SocRMum1
Jan 18 2012, 02:39 PM

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
I, myself, am particularly fond of the Peter......oh wait.....that's not what you meant.

Or is it?
Try to keep up, will ya?? :fp2:
How the hell am I suppose to keep up with all the fanwanking??

As a non-shipper of any coupling at the moment, I find it hard to wade thru the shipping.

Now, about this Peter.....
You make a good point. ^o) But let it be said that a good Peter should stand out all on it's own. :$

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
lysie


The spoilers are in the first post. Discuss those.

I'll start. Hope turns to Doug and Julie. Were they supposed to already be out of the country or is this were that's established?
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SoapGal1
Member Avatar


lysie
Jan 18 2012, 03:02 PM
The spoilers are in the first post. Discuss those.

I'll start. Hope turns to Doug and Julie. Were they supposed to already be out of the country or is this were that's established?
Marlena has a disasterous lunch...


What did she get a bad egg salad sandwich?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
mer4santo
Member Avatar


Angie79
Jan 11 2012, 04:23 AM
Hope wonders if she should open Alice's box of secrets;
This sounds wrong on so many levels.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
daisy132


LuvingLumi
Jan 18 2012, 02:04 PM
daisy132
Jan 18 2012, 01:58 PM
LuvingLumi
Jan 18 2012, 01:45 PM
SocRMum1
Jan 18 2012, 01:39 PM

Quoting limited to 4 levels deepall
But somehow all three women ended up in Baker's clinic (Nicole miscarried there, Sami and Mia gave birth there)...don't you find that strange?

He'd definately do that because he dislikes both women enough to play with their lives. Nicole did all this switch and it turns out that she actually could have raised her own daughter all along and Sami tried to hide the kid from EJ only to have gotten her in the end and now she loses her to Nicole. It's not totally farfetched, as the Will shooting storyline proves when the writers put stuff into the story to make viewers question it (I'm thinking of the toothbrush and all) it's done for a reason.
No, it's not strange at all. All women were at that clinic because the common denominator was Dr. Baker. He is the one who ultimately agreed to the switch. Didn't Nicole go to great lengths to make sure that Sami ends up giving birth at that clinic? It was all for the sake of the baby switch storyline.
Dr. Baker who was working for both Stefano and Nicole....it was to Bakers benefit to continue to have money streaming in....SOMEHOW right?

Don't you find it strange that Nicole ended up there when she miscarried? I do....
No, I don't find that strange at all. She ended up there to be introduced to Dr. Baker, who would be involved in the whole storyline. His money kept streaming through Nicole, since she was Mrs. EJ Dimera, and he was sworn to secrecy throughout the storyline. Stephano found out about Nicole's plans later, and saw to it that she carried them through, so that he could get SAMI's child since he knew she had no intention of ever letting EJ have contact with it.

Some have implied that Stephano caused the miscarriage through the strawberries she ate, but why in the world would he do that at all?? Nicole was pregnant with EJ's baby, she worshiped EJ AND Stephano, and was super excited to give them a Dimera heir.

Compare that with Sami, who kept her pregnancy hidden, had no intention of ever telling the Dimeras anything about it, and put herself in protective custody in order to accomplish that. If Stephano caused ANYONE's miscarriage to bring the baby to term, it would have been Sami's.

Changing Johnny's and Sydney's paternity would serve only ONE purpose: to sever all ties between Sami and EJ, and have them paired with Lucas/Nicole which IMO this is what this whole drive to see it happen is all about, because the potential for great storylines involving the Brady/Dimera children would be very great, and it would only benefit the show.
Edited by daisy132, Jan 18 2012, 05:02 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply