Follow @DaytimeRoyalty
| Hello, soap fans -- and welcome to Daytime Royalty! For those unfamiliar, we are an uncensored community for fans and lovers of the daytime genre. We have a no-holds-barred atmosphere in regards to the shows, writers, actors etc. but we do not allow member suffering succotash in any form. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member, please log in to your account to access all of our features. |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Daytime Royalty interview with Ian Buchanan! | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 7 2012, 04:27 PM (3,514 Views) | |
| Drew | Feb 8 2012, 03:52 AM Post #21 |
![]()
|
Is there anyone Kate didn't sleep with before 1993? |
![]() |
|
| LuvingLumi | Feb 8 2012, 09:46 AM Post #22 |
![]()
Come on Ron, We are counting on YOU !!
![]()
|
I am also sort of astounded that he has a relationship with Madison and he's not her father and then the Kate thing....so she's a significant past love in his life? Rekindling that romance? It looks like State might be over....in the end she did marry him out of blackmail....those can't last forever, lol. |
![]() |
|
| DiMera87 | Feb 8 2012, 11:29 AM Post #23 |
![]()
|
For me its better this way. If he was Madison's father, then Kate would obviously be the whore he ran off with causing her mother to go into a deep depression. Kate has been the other woman about 50 times already so I don't really need to see that. Plus now Madison can hate him, but still get jealous or worried if he starts showing signs of still being interested in Kate. This way has much more potential, IMO. PLUS if SJB and IB end up having great chemistry it still leaves the door open that they could be working together. |
![]() |
|
| six | Feb 8 2012, 11:49 AM Post #24 |
![]() ![]()
|
I've heard they'll share at least one scene. |
![]() |
|
| Lil | Feb 8 2012, 03:21 PM Post #25 |
![]()
|
Very excited!! :-) |
![]() |
|
| six | Feb 8 2012, 04:30 PM Post #26 |
![]() ![]()
|
Plus it's on a soap. There's something wrong when a marriage based on blackmail between a woman and her pimp is one of the most stable marriages on the show. |
![]() |
|
| SlyestFox | Feb 11 2012, 07:00 PM Post #27 |
![]()
|
Do we know if Ian's on contract or not? The fact that he doesn't know how long he's scheduled to be on the show makes it sound like he's recurring. |
![]() |
|
| Ellie | Feb 12 2012, 11:00 AM Post #28 |
![]()
|
If someone says "at least a year" or whatever the exact wording was, that probably means he's on a year contract. I don't think they'd bring in someone as big as Ian Buchanan and just put him on recurring. That's not usually how it works. (John A. is on recurring because he wants to be.) |
![]() |
|
| SlyestFox | Feb 12 2012, 12:54 PM Post #29 |
![]()
|
Yeah, but these days with soaps so few it seems a lot of big name people you wouldn't think would be on recurring now are. John Aniston may be recurring on his own accord, but Wally Kurth, Judi Evans and Mary Beth Evans aren't and all of them are big soap names and not just from Days. He may well have a year-long contract, but the fact that it's been made clear returnees Bryan and Lisa are on contract and we haven't heard that anywhere about Ian Buchanan makes me wonder. Either way, should be easy enough to find out in the credits. If he's listed after Sarah Brown but before the recurring people, he'll be contract. I checked on Friday but no recurrers appeared that week so he was last either way. |
![]() |
|
| Ellie | Feb 12 2012, 01:10 PM Post #30 |
![]()
|
Right, but they're hardly on. It helps the show financially to have someone who's on often, on contract. I guess we'll see how frequently Ian's on but I get the impression he'll be a "regular". |
![]() |
|
| lysie | Feb 12 2012, 01:10 PM Post #31 |
![]()
|
It wasn't made clear with Bryan until we asked. We didn't think to recycle the question. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2












9:13 AM Jul 11