Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]



Hello, soap fans -- and welcome to Daytime Royalty!

For those unfamiliar, we are an uncensored community for fans and lovers of the daytime genre. We have a no-holds-barred atmosphere in regards to the shows, writers, actors etc. but we do not allow member suffering succotash in any form.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member, please log in to your account to access all of our features.

Username:   Password:
Locked Topic
Interesting/Spoilerish Tweets, Week of 6/25; Twitter/FB list in first post
Topic Started: Jun 25 2012, 04:38 AM (52,207 Views)
Kenny
Member Avatar


DesignatedShelley
Jun 25 2012, 08:19 PM
happy
Jun 25 2012, 08:01 PM
Sindacco
Jun 25 2012, 05:38 PM
LuvingLumi
Jun 25 2012, 04:48 PM
I want Jack to return and have something with Kristen
She was partly responsible for sending Jack to prison.
I didn't know they were on the show at the same time. Why did she send him to jail?
He was accused of killing Peter and Kristen knew Peter was really alive, but chose not to reveal it. IIRC it's just out of loyalty to her brother, who was still was in love with Jennifer.

ETA: Or perhaps it was that Stefano made her keep quiet?
Don't forget she also dug up the body and had it cremated so Laura couldn't prove it wasn't Peter in the coffin.

Offline Profile Goto Top
 
happy
Member Avatar


Thanks. I read other post and realized this was the Fake J&J - so I just ignore that history. Like I ignore the alien twins. And like so much of John's past has been rewritten and ignored. Seems he is no longer a DiMera (and I liked Robo John).

It's a shame this show has had so many regimes that have ignored/rewritten history. It gets confusing.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
six
Member Avatar


And she had Laura drugged so people wouldn't believe her. She was willingly in on the deception.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Kenny
Member Avatar


six
Jun 25 2012, 08:26 PM
And she had Laura drugged so people wouldn't believe her. She was willingly in on the deception.
Yes. She facilitated Stefano's kidnapping of Laura so he could use a laser on her brain to make her forget seeing Peter alive. Later, when Laura was freed, Kristen kept her drugged 24/7 so everyone would think she was nuts and not believe her rants about Peter faking his death and framing Jack for his murder.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
DaysForever
Member Avatar


This anticipation is killing us all.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
ShaneDOOLFan
Member Avatar


honestly I think the show acts like Peter Blake never happened, wonder if they still will if Kristen does return.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
DiMera87
Member Avatar


ShaneDOOLFan
Jun 25 2012, 08:32 PM
honestly I think the show acts like Peter Blake never happened, wonder if they still will if Kristen does return.
I think they will wait and see if Kristen pans out. By now there has to be some hesitation around these big returns. They probably don't want to start building a family around her when she already has a bunch of ties on canvas. But I don't think the lack of Peter mentions has anything to do with what happened with Melissa Reeves. The character of Peter didn't leave any lasting impact on the show and I don't think there's any reason to bring him up anyway. He was a good villain when he was around and he was easy to hate, but he didn't leave any lasting effects. The only reason for him to ever come up would be if Abigail or Jack wanted to throw Jennifer's past relationships in her face. Other than that there's no purpose to mention Peter. Although that could change with Kristen on canvas.
Edited by DiMera87, Jun 25 2012, 08:51 PM.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Ally
Member Avatar
The Royal Princess

I'm not a fan of waiting :toetap:
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Sindacco
Member Avatar


DiMeraFan67
Jun 25 2012, 08:51 PM
ShaneDOOLFan
Jun 25 2012, 08:32 PM
honestly I think the show acts like Peter Blake never happened, wonder if they still will if Kristen does return.
I think they will wait and see if Kristen pans out. By now there has to be some hesitation around these big returns. They probably don't want to start building a family around her when she already has a bunch of ties on canvas. But I don't think the lack of Peter mentions has anything to do with what happened with Melissa Reeves. The character of Peter didn't leave any lasting impact on the show and I don't think there's any reason to bring him up anyway. He was a good villain when he was around and he was easy to hate, but he didn't leave any lasting effects. The only reason for him to ever come up would be if Abigail or Jack wanted to throw Jennifer's past relationships in her face. Other than that there's no purpose to mention Peter. Although that could change with Kristen on canvas.
Maybe now 14 years later there hasn't been a good reason to mention Peter but back in 2000-2003 there were several scenes that made it seem that Peter never existed in Jack and Jennifer's story but he was still mentined a few times in scenes with other characters. It's obvious he isn't mentioned in Jennifer related stuff because of Melissa Reeves.

And now when I think about, there was a good reason to mention him last fall when Jack and Jennifer didn't want Abby to date Chad because he was a DiMera

Even this past month with all the talk about EJ not being Stefano's biological son. Stefano loved Peter and Kristen even if they weren't his real children. Tony was mentioned in those Stefano/EJ scenes, but scriptwriter got that history wrong too.
Edited by Sindacco, Jun 25 2012, 09:15 PM.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Poker Face
Member Avatar
"I like to be on top, Darling." - John Ross/Pamela

Kenny
Jun 25 2012, 08:30 PM
six
Jun 25 2012, 08:26 PM
And she had Laura drugged so people wouldn't believe her. She was willingly in on the deception.
Yes. She facilitated Stefano's kidnapping of Laura so he could use a laser on her brain to make her forget seeing Peter alive. Later, when Laura was freed, Kristen kept her drugged 24/7 so everyone would think she was nuts and not believe her rants about Peter faking his death and framing Jack for his murder.
lmfao sigh those were the days.also everytime laura would say in front of the whole clan "kristen u were there i saw u" marlena's face was priceless!!!! priceless!

omg another great moment was when marlena asked celeste's help so she could help laura remember.

also felt like they were having an orgasm .......im so twisted.....hehe
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
SocRMum1
Member Avatar
Much prefers sweevil, snarky EJ over Father Figure Fucktard Eejiot.

six
Jun 25 2012, 08:19 PM
The cynic in me wonders if this is a ploy to get people to buy the magazine or blog or whatever it is. Hope I'm wrong and it's actually something big.

Agreed. And I think this is something Nellie would totally do...capitalize on the rumors that are already running rampant and tap into that to pander his rag.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Carly
Member Avatar


I'd like Kristen to come to Salem by herself, and then Peter can arrive about six months later. Kristen could have mysterious phone conversations with a secret accomplice, and then we could learn that the accomplice is Peter. And Peter's return could give some meaty material to Jack and Jen. (Well, it could give some meaty material to Jack . At this point, I don't give a crap about Jen!)

I'd like to see EJ and Peter fighting for control of DiMera Enterprises. And I agree with whoever suggested Trevor St. John as a recast for Peter. Oh, the awesome potential!
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
ShaneDOOLFan
Member Avatar


I just dont think Melissa Reeves would work with a recast even, makes me think there is some kind of clause or elephant in the room. Its all about Kristen though for me ;)
Edited by ShaneDOOLFan, Jun 25 2012, 09:24 PM.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Jarlena4Eva
Member Avatar
Jarlena-Holic

I want Eileen Davidson back for this reason. :rockon:

Edited by Jarlena4Eva, Jun 25 2012, 09:31 PM.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
DiMera87
Member Avatar


Sindacco
Jun 25 2012, 09:08 PM
DiMeraFan67
Jun 25 2012, 08:51 PM
ShaneDOOLFan
Jun 25 2012, 08:32 PM
honestly I think the show acts like Peter Blake never happened, wonder if they still will if Kristen does return.
I think they will wait and see if Kristen pans out. By now there has to be some hesitation around these big returns. They probably don't want to start building a family around her when she already has a bunch of ties on canvas. But I don't think the lack of Peter mentions has anything to do with what happened with Melissa Reeves. The character of Peter didn't leave any lasting impact on the show and I don't think there's any reason to bring him up anyway. He was a good villain when he was around and he was easy to hate, but he didn't leave any lasting effects. The only reason for him to ever come up would be if Abigail or Jack wanted to throw Jennifer's past relationships in her face. Other than that there's no purpose to mention Peter. Although that could change with Kristen on canvas.
Maybe now 14 years later there hasn't been a good reason to mention Peter but back in 2000-2003 there were several scenes that made it seem that Peter never existed in Jack and Jennifer's story but he was still mentined a few times in scenes with other characters. It's obvious he isn't mentioned in Jennifer related stuff because of Melissa Reeves.

And now when I think about, there was a good reason to mention him last fall when Jack and Jennifer didn't want Abby to date Chad because he was a DiMera

Even this past month with all the talk about EJ not being Stefano's biological son. Stefano loved Peter and Kristen even if they weren't his real children. Tony was mentioned in those Stefano/EJ scenes, but scriptwriter got that history wrong too.
Those are legit reasons, but I just don't find Peter important enough to bring up out of the blue. Especially in a conversation between Jack/Jennifer/Abigail. That would make Jack look like a dickhead for bringing that up. Maybe Melissa Reeves does have a problem with it or maybe the writers just don't go there out of consideration for MR just incase.

Anyway, I'm in favor of revisiting Peter Blake with a recast IF they establish Kristen's place on the canvas first. A lot of people will not know the character of Kristen and if they start building a family right away it could backfire.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
nickyj12345
Member Avatar



"Heather Lindell and Farah Fath return to #DOOL! Dee and Drake let go again!" or something equally stupid.

I can see Tomsell giving vets like Dee and Drake the hook to bring back nobodies. I'm a little scared, TBH.
Edited by nickyj12345, Jun 25 2012, 10:27 PM.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
DiMera87
Member Avatar


nickyj12345
Jun 25 2012, 10:25 PM
Quote:
 
Nelson Branco @NellieBranco
Heather Lindell and Farah Fath return to #DOOL! Dee and Drake let go again!


I can see Tomsell giving vets like Dee and Drake the hook to bring back nobodies. I'm a little scared, TBH.
I hate you with a passion. I just saw the Farah Fath shit and DH's let go. It was very believable (which speaks to the decisions this show makes). Once I saw Heather Lindell I felt a lot better.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
nickyj12345
Member Avatar


DiMeraFan67
Jun 25 2012, 10:26 PM
nickyj12345
Jun 25 2012, 10:25 PM
Quote:
 
Nelson Branco @NellieBranco
Heather Lindell and Farah Fath return to #DOOL! Dee and Drake let go again!


I can see Tomsell giving vets like Dee and Drake the hook to bring back nobodies. I'm a little scared, TBH.
I hate you with a passion. I just saw the Farah Fath shit and DH's let go. It was very believable (which speaks to the decisions this show makes). Once I saw Heather Lindell I felt a lot better.
Sorry - I edited my post. I realized that if you were scrolling by it would look real. Apologies!
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
DiMera87
Member Avatar


Quote:
 
soapwikijohn @soapwikijohn
You know what I might just be a mean mean mean twitter if I reveal who ‪#Days‬ is bringing back ;) <-CLUE YOU FOOLS CLUE!!! ‪#NotSoCrypticTweet‬


Okay so I'm not sure how legit this guy is but since he's been quoted here a lot lately that's his latest tweet. It was also RTed by @HotMessMandy so I guess they are willing to go all out and state that its Eileen Davidson.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Kenny
Member Avatar


The insiders have all but confirmed they're talking about Eileen re: the big return. Now we just need the show to confirm it at as well. Maybe tomorrow.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums. Reliable service with over 8 years of experience.
Learn More · Sign-up Now
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · DAYS: News, Spoilers & Discussion · Next Topic »
Locked Topic