Follow @DaytimeRoyalty
| Hello, soap fans -- and welcome to Daytime Royalty! For those unfamiliar, we are an uncensored community for fans and lovers of the daytime genre. We have a no-holds-barred atmosphere in regards to the shows, writers, actors etc. but we do not allow member bashing in any form. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member, please log in to your account to access all of our features. |
| Ratings for the Week of July 2-6, 2012 | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jul 14 2012, 04:29 PM (1,862 Views) | |
| lightandday | Jul 14 2012, 04:29 PM Post #1 |
![]()
HBD-Nesta Robert Marley,February 6, 1945 BitchesBrew
![]()
|
Total Viewers 1. Y&R 4,505,000 (-38,000/-77,000) 2. B&B 3,115,000 (-223,000/+153,000) 3. DAYS 2,409,000 (+80,000/+139,000) 4. GH 2,242,000 (-35,000/-27,000) Households 1. Y&R 3.2/10 (-.2/-.1) 2. B&B 2.3/7 (-.2/+.2) 3. DAYS 1.7/5 (same/+.1) 3. GH 1.7/5 (same/same) Women 18-49 Viewers 1. Y&R 816,000 (-50,000/-98,000) 2. B&B 628,000 (-51,000/+59,000) 3. GH 539,000 (-19,000/-75,000) 4. DAYS 451,000 (-5,000/-168,000) Women 18-49 Rating 1. Y&R 1.3/8 (-.1/-.1) 2. B&B 1.0/6 (-.1/+.1) 3. GH 0.8/5 (-.1/-.1) <—— ties low 4. DAYS 0.7/5 (same/-.2) <—— ties low (3rd straight week) Women 18-34 Rating 1. Y&R 0.7 (+.1/-.1) 2. B&B 0.5 (same/+.1) 3. DAYS 0.4 (+.1/-.2) 3. GH 0.4 (same/-.1) Men 18+ Viewers 1. Y&R 959,000 (-14,000/-55,000) 2. B&B 602,000 (-57,000/-47,000) 3. DAYS 547,000 (+25,000/+56,000) 4. GH 432,000 (+3,000/+68,000) DAYS Monday: 1.9/2,574,000 Tuesday: 1.7/2,417,000 Wednesday: 1.7/2,416,000 Thursday: 1.7/2,273,000 Friday: 1.6/2,365,000 Link |
![]() |
|
| outrageous | Jul 14 2012, 06:53 PM Post #2 |
![]()
|
A little better.... |
![]() |
|
| blueskies | Jul 14 2012, 08:22 PM Post #3 |
![]() ![]()
|
I'm surprised the ratings are even this good given the massive power outage that week. |
![]() |
|
| philip&stephanie | Jul 14 2012, 08:31 PM Post #4 |
![]()
|
I am happy to see that Days is up from last year. |
![]() |
|
| WGuyMd35 | Jul 14 2012, 09:46 PM Post #5 |
![]()
|
Are the change over last year numbers correct? If so, Days is UP 139,000 total viewers from last year, but down 168,000 in women? Men is only up 56k, so there must be alot of new under 18 or over 50 viewers. ? |
![]() |
|
| blueskies | Jul 14 2012, 11:37 PM Post #6 |
![]() ![]()
|
Well, its not under 18, all over 50. Unfortunately that's what MarDar did to the ratings. Killed the demo and added over 50s. Not that it should matter who's watching as long as they are, but it's an unfortunate fact they base advertising dollars on 18-49. Would have been nice if they could have kept the 18-49 and added everyone they did. |
![]() |
|
| PhoenixRising05 | Jul 14 2012, 11:37 PM Post #7 |
|
GET EM STEPH!!
![]()
|
This has to be the first time in YEARS Days went up at all for 4th of July week. I'm also shocked that they counted the whole week. I thought they may at least have the 4th of July declared a special episode and not counted it. All the soaps, especially Days and GH, should be grateful with these numbers given the holiday. |
![]() |
|
| PhoenixRising05 | Jul 14 2012, 11:39 PM Post #8 |
|
GET EM STEPH!!
![]()
|
Not just MarDar, although I fear they made it worse. This started under the last regime too. It seemed to start around Fall 2009 when Bo and Hope got more story and Carly and Vivian returned. That was when the 18-49 and 18-34 demos started to decrease. It was also in Spring 2010 that we started hearing that the Days brass was trying to get NBC to see that the over 50 demo should be seen as important too. |
![]() |
|
| Eric83 | Jul 15 2012, 11:28 AM Post #9 |
![]()
"Relax nobody's having sex.... at least not yet"
![]()
|
It continues to baffle me why daytime execs are so concerned about the 18-49 demo especially in these changing times. Most women 18-30 these days are out in college, working, etc. They should focus on 25-54 IMO. |
![]() |
|
| Eric83 | Jul 15 2012, 11:29 AM Post #10 |
![]()
"Relax nobody's having sex.... at least not yet"
![]()
|
But didn't always go down because of Wimbledon? |
![]() |
|
| PhoenixRising05 | Jul 15 2012, 05:09 PM Post #11 |
|
GET EM STEPH!!
![]()
|
Yeah, it did. I remember in the 90's Days would go up Wimbledon week but right around 2000 that changed. From that point on, the show did horrible Wimbledon week. This set of ratings would've been for Wimbledon week had it still been on NBC and Days actually saw some stability and some minor increases. I never thought I would see that, especially given the show was aired the whole week. |
![]() |
|
| dooldooldool | Jul 16 2012, 12:51 AM Post #12 |
![]()
|
It's not the "daytime execs" who are concerned. It's the advertisers. They only want to spend money on programs with audiences whose buying patterns are not locked in stone (ie 18-49). 55-year-olds don't change what they buy. If they have bought Colgate for a decade or two, they aren't going to switch to Crest. I haven't watched a commercial on DOOL since the late 1980s, so I don't have a clue what is advertised these days. I do know that NBC has always skewed more affluent audience-wise, so that surely helps with anemic ratings. |
![]() |
|
| happy | Jul 16 2012, 09:16 AM Post #13 |
![]()
|
I'm shocked DOOL did better than GH. I guess people didn't want to tune in for the McBam/Liason kisses. I personally think McBam are hawt! But I still can't watch the show. Too campy for my taste. So instead, I just YouTube Sam and McBain every once in a while. |
![]() |
|
| Eric83 | Jul 16 2012, 02:48 PM Post #14 |
![]()
"Relax nobody's having sex.... at least not yet"
![]()
|
Well then it baffles me why advertisers are concerned then. I don't believe because someone is a certain age they are set in their ways about EVERYTHING and 54 is only 5 years from 49. Young women are not at home taking care of the babies anymore. They are in college, they have jobs, I think they should focus on the older audience when they clearly perform better with the 25-54 group, but it's whatever. |
![]() |
|
| miou07 | Jul 16 2012, 03:16 PM Post #15 |
![]()
|
There are a lot of people who think the whole 18-49 theory is BS. I'm still in that demo -- but I'm not easily swayed in my buying habits. If I find a product that works, I stick by it like glue. My mom who is in her 70's is willing to try any new product. She has almost no brand loyalty. Go figure. But for advertisers, one size fits all. They have an almost religious devotion to that demo. And if a show fails to bring in enough eyeballs from that demo, it is considered DOA. The exceptions are shows like 60 Minutes that have a majority affluent, older viewership. Edited by miou07, Jul 16 2012, 03:20 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| reagon | Jul 16 2012, 06:56 PM Post #16 |
![]()
|
You know what it doesn't matter what anyone thinks. Tis argument as far as advertising demos has been going on for years particularly as younger audiences fade from a once popular show. Fact is less people 18.to 49 watch TV than folks over 50. It's all about supply and demand. Why on earth would an advertiser pay more for an audience easier to reach than one who's harder to reach, it's why ESPN commands the highest ad rates of any network because men 18 to 49 is the hardest audience to reach and that happens to be ESPNs target audience |
![]() |
|
| denise13 | Jul 19 2012, 11:34 AM Post #17 |
![]()
|
Interesting ratings at this point in the summer. What the networks doesn't understand is without my grandparents & nanny watching soaps, this 21 year old college student wouldn't be a soap fan. Until the networks adapt to change with their core audience, and realizes that the young audience they are targeting comes from the older audience that they are disregarding in their pursuit of a younger audience, the ratings will continue to decline. You can't continue disrespect your core audience, and expect them to stick around. |
![]() |
|
| Magmurphy | Jul 24 2012, 01:16 AM Post #18 |
![]()
|
Unbelievable! To see Days moved up! I’ve been waiting for it to climb up! |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · General Daytime News · Next Topic » |













3:33 AM May 26