Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]



Hello, soap fans -- and welcome to Daytime Royalty!

For those unfamiliar, we are an uncensored community for fans and lovers of the daytime genre. We have a no-holds-barred atmosphere in regards to the shows, writers, actors etc. but we do not allow member bashing in any form.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member, please log in to your account to access all of our features.

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
AMC One Year Ago: Leo Returns!
Topic Started: Aug 17 2012, 01:59 AM (1,281 Views)
AmyJo


Last year around this time, Josh Duhamel AKA: "Leo du Pres" made a one episode return to the soap and the role that made him famous. Fans of AMC were certain that Leo was still "alive", since his body was never found. Unfortunately, due to crazy happenings behind the scenes, it appeared that Leo's return was only a dream or a hallucination of his wife, "Greenlee". Many fans of AMC were extremely disappointed, myself included! But one thing that we weren't disappointed in one bit was the still abundant chemistry that exists between Josh Duhamel and Rebecca Budig. Even after all these years apart, they didn't miss a beat. It doesn't matter what's going on in their personal lives. These two actors have a very strong natural attraction for each other and it's palpable in the following clip. Someone should put them in a movie together ASAP! You can't make this stuff up; it's just there, period! Judge for yourselves:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EC_ek7mtbdg
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · The Video Vault · Next Topic »
Add Reply